Archive

Posts Tagged ‘TCU’

Review of My 2011 Top Non-AQ Teams!

January 23rd, 2012 1 comment

Every year in my magazine, I list my Top Non-AQ teams for that particular year and over the course of the last six seasons I have had great success!

In 2006, my top non-AQ team was Boise St and I PROJECTED THEM INTO A BCS BOWL and they went undefeated and got to the Fiesta Bowl where they beat Oklahoma. In 2007, I called for Hawaii to go 12-0 and grab a SUGAR BOWL BERTH and that is exactly what they did!

In 2008 my top non-AQ team was Utah and while they were NOT RANKED in the preseason and no one picked them to even win the MWC at the start of the year except me, they finished unbeaten and #2 in the country! In 2009 my Top non-AQ team was Boise St and when they beat TCU in the Fiesta Bowl they finished #4 and the top non-AQ team in the country. In 2010 it was FIVE in a row. EVERYONE had Boise St as their top non AQ team but I went against the grain and picked TCU and coach Patterson and company did not disappoint as they knocked off Wisconsin in the Rose Bowl and finished #2 in the country, naturally the top rated non AQ team out there (Boise #9!) Read more…

Poinsettia Bowl Forecast!

December 21st, 2011 No comments

 

POINSETTIA BOWL
Wednesday, December 21st @ 8:00 p.m.
Click on the bowl logo for MORE info!!!!

LA TECH (8-4) VS TCU (10-2)

Rushing
Passing
Points
TO’s
ST
A.O.R
LA TECH 85
225
22
2.3
-
95.2
TCU
160
210
27
2.8
-
91.6
First meeting. LT is making its 6th bowl appearance and their 1st under HC Dykes (WAC COY) and is 2-2-1. TCU is 6-4 in bowls under Patterson and ply’d an undefeated Boise in this bowl in ‘08, winning by 1. Tech stumbled out of the gate to a 1-4 start with 3 of its 1st 4 losses coming by a comb 9 pts, but got its ssn turned around in a big way and won 7 consec (most S/’74) with 5 coming on the road en route to claiming the WAC Title (first S/’01). Frogs went 5-2 vs bowl tms (2 losses by a comb 9 pts) outscoring those foes 35-29 and outgaining them 455-413. TCU tallied its 3rd MWC Title in its last go-round in the conf. For the 8th time under HC Patterson, TCU has 10 wins (4th str yr) and their 19 Sr’s became the 4th str class to set a TCU win record. Frogs may be in a letdown spot here as they’ve landed BCS gms the L2Y and held their breath for a 3rd str, but failed to jump into the Top 16. TCU traveled 30,000 to the Rose Bowl LY and 20,000+ to the Fiesta Bowl in ‘09, but expect less for this non-BCS gm. After B2B BCS appearances, and lobbying TY for a 3rd straight, this is not the matchup TCU wanted. LA Tech has now improved its record 3 straight years, and while an 8 win season is an improvement, a bowl win vs a team that won the Rose Bowl LY will be a feather in their cap. This one will be closer than what many think but in the end the Horned Frogs come away with the win.

PHIL’S FORECAST: TCU 34 LOUISIANA TECH 27

2011 Homefield Edges

July 28th, 2011 5 comments

I have gotten many requests to do a blog to explain how I compute each teams home field edge in the magazine. I have 27 different factors in my computer’s grade of a team. I then compare the computer’s analysis to my own and make the final decision.

While I mention that there are 27 factors in my home field computer ratings, there are actually nine individual factors that I use each year and I then combine the grades for the last three years giving half of the grade to last year, 30% to the numbers from two years ago and 20% to the computer rankings from three years ago.

Today I will go over the nine different areas that I use to rate home field edge. The first category is the stadium capacity. The largest stadium in the country last year was Penn St which held 107,282 and my computer gave them the maximum score of 6 for that category. My home field edges go from 0 to 6 in the magazine so they have the same scale in the computer. The smallest capacity is Idaho’s Kibbie Dome which seated just 16,000 and they received a 0 in that category. The rest of the capacities are done with a simple equation of Capacity-16,000 divided by 15,250. The reason I divide by 15,250 is that Penn St at 107,282-16,000 = 91,282 and 91,282 divided by 6 (0-6 scale) = 15,214 and I rounded up to get the 15,250. You can figure out what your favorite team is graded in this category by using this simple equation.

The second category is actual attendance reported by the school in 2010. Once again Michigan was at the top with 111,825 and this time the team at the bottom was Ball St which averaged just 8,947 fans per game last year. I used the same method as above to turn this data into a 0 to 6 rating where Michigan received a 6, Ball St a 0 and as an example Florida St with an attendance of 71,270 earned a 4.15 grade. Read more…

Odds to Win 2011-12 BCS National Championship

February 14th, 2011 1 comment

Over the weekend I released my projected preseason AP Top 10 and I thought I would analyze another set of rankings for the upcoming season. A couple of weeks ago, several casinos released their odds for the 2011-12 BCS National Championship. While PhilSteele.com does not affiliate itself with gambling, I do think it is interesting to see how Vegas is examining the upcoming season.

Here are the Top 10 Favorites to win the title this upcoming year courtesy of Bodog.com.

1. Oklahoma             Odds: 7/2

If you checked out my projected AP Top 10 blog, you would have read that the Sooners are clearly the favorite going into next season and the odds certainly agree here. They return 15 starters on off/def including QB Jones, WR Broyles and LB Lewis. Their schedule sets up nicely with a bye before their road trip to Florida St (a team they dominated LY 47-17). In Big 12 play naturally there is the Red River Rivalry game vs Texas who is coming off a 5-7 season and the only other huge hurdle could be the season finale at Oklahoma St but the Sooners have won the Bedlam rivalry 8 straight times and have an overall mark of 82-16-7 vs their in-state rivals. Read more…

2011 Returning Starters!

January 26th, 2011 3 comments

We have already been working hard on the 2011 season and Today’s blog is the current list for Returning Starters for each team in 2011 broken down by offense, defense and special teams (kicker/punter). The * on the offense number denotes that the starting QB is returning. Below the list I broke down teams with the most/least returning starters.

I will be back later this week with all the Senior Bowl/Pro Bowl coverage you need to prepare you for this weekend’s games. On Monday I will expand on the Las Vegas odds to win the 2011 BCS National Championship and give you a breakdown of each of the 50 teams including key starters back/lost. Read more…

January 1st Bowl Forecasts

January 1st, 2011 No comments

Happy New Year!!!

TICKET CITY BOWL
12:00 PM ESPNU
Click bowl logo for MORE info!!!!

NORTHWESTERN (7-5) VS TEXAS TECH (7-5)

Rushing
Passing
Points
TO’s
ST
A.O.R
NORTHWESTERN 156
255
26
2.7
98.1
TEXAS TECH
164
350
37
2.6
-
101.3
This is the inaugural year of the TicketCity Bowl which will be played at the Cotton Bowl and fittingly this is the 1st matchup for these programs. The Raiders return to the post season for the 11th straight year and they are the only team in the Big 12 to be bowl eligible every season in the conference’s existence. Northwestern is headed to its 3rd straight bowl under Fitzgerald and he has made it the program’s goal to win a bowl game for the 1st time S/’48 (lost L/7). TT played Baylor in this stadium on Oct 9th beating the bowl bound Bears 45-38 while this is the Cats 1st trip here. TT will have a significant crowd edge as Lubbock is a 6 hr drive from Dallas and they have many alums in the area.

After throwing the game winning TD pass to knock off Iowa, Persa ruptured his Achilles tendon. Persa had accounted for 75.5% of NW’s offense and his 73.5% comp set a school record and is #2 in B10 history. His replacement is 6’6” pocket passer Watkins who hit 129 (55%) with a 1-4 ratio (49 rush) in his 2 starts and the Cats actually burned the RS off the more mobile Colten for the L/2. The 2 QB’s comb for 6 TO’s in the finale loss to Wisky and Ftizgerald vowed the squad would get right back to work with practice so the frosh QB’s could get more experience before the bowl. On defense NW finished #36 pass eff D (231, 59%, 21-14) led by #1 tkl’r S Peters and top cover CB Mabin. K Demos struggled at times (missing 2 FG’s in the Purdue loss) and would like to atone for missing the potential GW in LY’s wild OT bowl loss to Auburn. P Williams is #3 B10 in net (38.2) with good placement (18 FC).

Tuberville vowed to keep the Air Raid offense but he added more of an emphasis on the run game and after running for over 140 yds in a game 18x in the previous 10Y, the Raiders did it 7x TY led by the combo of Batch and Stephens. The pass #’s shrunk as expected -72 ypg although QB Potts finished as the B12’s #3 passer. The D also had a major scheme change as they went to a 3-4. Depth was a major issue and Tuberville numerous times bemoaned the unit’s lack of speed until he eventually said the best way for them to win was to simply outscore people. Inj’s really hit the secondary hard as TT’s pass D finished dead last in the FBS ypg all’d although they were #87 in my pass eff D (306, 62%, 27-14). TT was #36 in ST’s even though they allowed onside K’s to be ret’d for TD’s in B2B gms vs ISU and Baylor. P LaCour’s net of 38.8 was #16 NCAA and KR Stephens remains 1 of the B12’s best.

Read more…

Top 25 Game Grades Plus Week 10 News and Notes

November 9th, 2010 No comments
RK FOE OFF
RUSH
OFF
PASS
OFF
PTS
DEF
RUSH
DEF
PASS
DEF
PTS
GM
Grade
1 TCU AT Utah 153 382 47 54 144 7 120.7
2 BOISE ST Hawaii 231 507 42 72 151 7 119.4
3 NEVADA AT Idaho 435 391 63 64 277 17 110.3
4 OKLAHOMA ST Baylor 286 438 55 199 265 28 102.6
5 ARKANSAS AT South Carolina 140 303 41 105 192 20 100.9
6 FLORIDA AT Vanderbilt 203 277 55 46 63 14 99.8
7 STANFORD Arizona 215 297 42 167 247 17 99.3
8 OREGON Washington 280 244 53 134 129 16 97.9
9 TEXAS A&M Oklahoma 167 232 33 86 289 19 94.3
9 LSU Alabama 225 204 24 107 214 21 94.3
11 N CAROLINA AT Florida St 36 437 37 109 258 35 94.1
12 BYU UNLV 216 300 55 22 122 7 91.6
13 NAVY AT East Carolina 521 75 76 154 413 35 91.3
14 TEXAS TECH Missouri 205 284 24 267 97 17 90.8
15 MIAMI FLA Maryland 218 286 26 96 158 20 89.7
16 AUBURN CHATTANOOGA 303 325 62 101 233 24 88.8
17 GEORGIA TECH AT Virginia Tech 346 80 21 198 137 28 88.6
18 TEMPLE AT Kent St 97 368 28 16 207 10 88.3
19 ARIZONA ST AT USC 116 282 33 187 215 34 86.9
20 MICHIGAN Illinois 257 419 67 315 246 65 86.1
21 IOWA ST Nebraska 157 203 30 235 79 31 85.0
22 PENN ST Northwestern 260 268 35 168 201 21 84.7
22 TULSA Rice 173 439 64 194 221 27 84.7
24 FRESNO ST AT Louisiana Tech 300 229 40 89 219 34 84.2
25 LOUISVILLE AT Syracuse 160 143 28 101 155 20 83.9

Read more…

Week 8 Top 25 Game Grades Plus News and Notes

October 25th, 2010 No comments
RK FOE OFF RUSH OFF PASS OFF PTS DEF RUSH DEF PASS DEF PTS Game Grade
1 UTAH Colorado St 222 426 59 28 186 6 107.8
2 OHIO ST Purdue 184 305 49 30 88 0 105.875
3 OREGON UCLA 269 313 60 135 159 13 103.95
3 TCU Air Force 376 185 38 181 47 7 103.95
5 MISSOURI Oklahoma 177 322 36 109 301 27 100.7
6 HAWAII AT Utah St 216 389 45 58 123 7 100.1
7 CALIFORNIA Arizona St 131 240 50 57 177 17 99
8 ALABAMA AT Tennessee 212 326 41 155 159 10 98.175
9 ARIZONA Washington 233 224 44 97 192 14 97.075
10 MIAMI FLA North Carolina 225 217 33 149 140 10 95.7
11 VIRGINIA TECH Duke 159 332 44 92 116 7 94.875
12 AUBURN LSU 441 86 24 114 129 17 94.6
13 WISCONSIN AT Iowa 141 206 31 11 257 30 93.225
14 TEMPLE AT Buffalo 266 131 42 63 98 0 91.85
14 NAVY Notre Dame 367 71 35 106 257 17 91.85
16 NEBRASKA AT Oklahoma St 229 312 51 212 283 41 91.025
17 LOUISVILLE Connecticut 160 195 26 108 87 0 90.475
18 PITTSBURGH Rutgers 206 307 41 95 108 21 89.65
19 BAYLOR Kansas St 279 404 47 109 298 42 88.825
20 IOWA ST AT Texas 199 136 28 98 344 21 87.775
21 S CAROLINA AT Vanderbilt 152 354 21 108 142 7 87.725
22 TEXAS A&M AT Kansas 227 294 45 201 130 10 85.525
23 CLEMSON Georgia Tech 236 167 27 242 83 13 83.875
24 W MICHIGAN AT Akron 137 382 56 154 120 10 81.675
25 HOUSTON AT SMU 164 233 45 127 318 20 81.625

Read more…

Top 25 Game Performances

September 5th, 2010 2 comments

Welcome to my Sunday Blog. During the offseason I had just one weekend blog but each week during the season I will take a look at the Top 25 performances from the just completed week with a little analysis as well as a quick review of the past weekend. On Monday I will give you my News & Notes where I delve deeper into every game that was played this past weekend, breaking down individual drives and giving you misleading finals and other interesting tidbits.

As far as my game grades go after the 2008 season was completed I devised a power ratings system, which lets me analyze at what level each team played during an individual game. This “game grade” takes into account the yards rushing, yards passing, points scored, rushing yards allowed, passing yards allowed and points allowed and factors them in against the opponent played and even factors in the site the game was played at.

With all these factors taken into consideration you will see teams that lost the game having a better individual game grade than teams that beat them simply because the team they played was superior and much less was expected of them. Read more…

AP Top 10 Projection Results

August 23rd, 2010 No comments

Over the weekend the preseason AP Top 25 was released with defending national champ Alabama clearly ranked #1. Every year I am particularly intrigued by who is placed in the preseason AP Top 10 as I try to predict what those teams will be shortly after the previous season is completed.

Most AP voters usually look at a couple of criteria when they evaluate a team for the upcoming season. First they look at the number of returning starters that the team has coming back particularly at the offensive skill positions. A team that returns its starting QB and a combination of its RB and WRs is often times more highly thought of than a team that loses its starting QB but returns its entire offensive line. Similarly a team that returns most of its starters on offense but loses a lot of its defensive playmakers usually is more highly thought of than a team that returns a majority of its defensive starters but loses its skill position players on offense. Read more…