<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Texas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.philsteele.com/tag/texas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.philsteele.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:26:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Year&#8217;s Eve Bowl Forecasts</title>
		<link>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/12/31/new-years-eve-bowl-forecasts-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/12/31/new-years-eve-bowl-forecasts-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Steele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bowl Projections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Bowl Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Football Forecasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Football Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bowls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chick-Fil-A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cincinnati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fight Hunger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forecasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northwestern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phil steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas A&M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanderbilt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.philsteele.com/?p=5116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MEINEKE CAR CARE BOWL Saturday, December 31st @ 12:00 p.m. Click on the bowl logo for MORE info!!!! TEXAS A&#38;M (6-6) VS NORTHWESTERN (6-6) Rushing Passing Points TO’s ST A.O.R TEXAS A&#38;M 205 290 37 2.5 ••• 100.6 NORTHWESTERN 102 270 26 2.1 - 96.9 In the 1st meeting between these programs one long postssn [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fblike_button" style="margin: 10px 0;"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F12%2F31%2Fnew-years-eve-bowl-forecasts-2%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:25px"></iframe></div>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F12%2F31%2Fnew-years-eve-bowl-forecasts-2%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F12%2F31%2Fnew-years-eve-bowl-forecasts-2%2F&amp;source=philsteele042&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<table width="550" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row" width="150"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/MeinkeCarCare.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/11-12bowls/11meineke_texas.jpg" alt="" width="144" height="105" /></a></th>
<th scope="row" width="422">MEINEKE CAR CARE BOWL<br />
Saturday, December 31st @ 12:00 p.m.<br />
Click on the bowl logo for MORE info!!!!</th>
<th scope="row" width="153"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/MeinkeCarCare.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/11-12bowls/11meineke_texas.jpg" alt="" width="144" height="105" /></a></th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table width="550" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<col span="6" width="85" />
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="17">
<h2 align="center">TEXAS A&amp;M (6-6) VS NORTHWESTERN (6-6)</h2>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="157" height="17"></td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Rushing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Passing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Points</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">TO’s</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">ST</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">A.O.R</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="17">TEXAS A&amp;M</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="104">205</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">290</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">37</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">2.5</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">•••</div>
</td>
<td width="104">100.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="17">NORTHWESTERN</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">102</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">270</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">26</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">2.1</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">-</div>
</td>
<td width="104">96.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="17">In the 1st meeting between these programs one long postssn losing streak will end as A&amp;M has lost their L/5 with their lone win S/’95 (1-9) coming in the defunct Galleryfurniture.com Bowl which was played in the Astrodome. The Ags are 1-4 vs B10 tms in bowls. NW is in its 4th str bowl under Fitzgerald where they are 0-3 but all have been by a TD or less. He has made it a primary goal to get the program’s 2nd ever bowl win as they’ve lost their L/8 S/’48. The Ags are cch’d here by DC DeRuyter after HC Sherman got the ax. College Station is less than a 2 hr drive from Houston so Maroon should flood the stands but Fitzgerald is familiar with the terrain making an estimated 100 recruiting trips over the yrs to the area as 5 Cats are from Houston. A&amp;M was 1-4 on the road TY but were only outscored by 1 ppg while outgaining foes 498-386. NW was 3-3 on the road outscoring foes 32-30 and outgaining them 440-433. A&amp;M went 3-6 vs bowl tms outscoring them 37-32 and outgaining them 509-414. NW was 1-5 vs bowl squads getting outscored 35-27 and outgained 429-418. The Aggies have 7 Sr st’r among 17 upperclassmen while the Cats have 10 Sr’s and 16. At first glance clearly the Aggies have the better personnel on offense, defense and ST&#8217;s but I do think NW&#8217;s QB Persa will make things interesting in what should be a high scoring and entertaining bowl.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="22">
<h3 align="justify">PHIL’S FORECAST: TEXAS A&amp;M 40 NORTHWESTERN 31</h3>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h1> <span id="more-5116"></span></h1>
<table width="550" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row" width="150"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/SunBowl.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/Blogpics/sun.jpg" alt="" width="140" height="116" /></a></th>
<th scope="row" width="422">SUN BOWL<br />
Saturday, December 31st @ 2:00 p.m.<br />
Click on the bowl logo for MORE info!!!!</th>
<th scope="row" width="153"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/SunBowl.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/Blogpics/sun.jpg" alt="" width="140" height="116" /></a></th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table width="550" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<col span="6" width="85" />
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="17">
<h2 align="center">UTAH (7-5) VS GEORGIA TECH (8-4)</h2>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="157" height="17"></td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Rushing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Passing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Points</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">TO’s</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">ST</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">A.O.R</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="17">UTAH</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="104">140</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">145</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">22</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">2.0</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">•••</div>
</td>
<td width="104">93.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="17">GEORGIA TECH</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">265</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">105</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">22</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">2.8</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">-</div>
</td>
<td width="104">97.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="17">GT and Utah have met one time prior which also occurred in the postseason when the Utes upset the Yellow Jackets 38-10 in the Emerald Bowl in HC Whittingham’s 1st yr taking over the reigns from Urban Meyer (Whittingham 5-1 in bowls with only outright loss coming LY to Boise). 9th consec bowl for Utah and 2nd visit to the Sun Bowl although that appearance was in ‘39 (26-0 win over NM). No common opp’s faced TY but the Utes do have a solid sked edge of #27-73. The Utes were 4-2 on the road TY but just 3-4 vs bowl caliber squads (outgained 340-309) but faced just one of those tms (UCLA) over their final 5 gms. Utah has 6 Sr st’rs among 18 upperclassmen while GT has 6 Sr’s among 12 upperclassmen. This is a long distance for GT fans and last year sold tickets for $14 to attract a crowd. It’s obvious that the game matches GT’s offense vs Utah’s D. Teams have been able to slow the Johnson-coached option as they’ve totaled an avg of just 8 ppg the L/3 bowls. Utah’s D may not get recognition, but they are a stout unit that will benefit from the extra time and at least slow the Yellow Jackets.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="22">
<h3 align="justify">PHIL’S FORECAST: UTAH 24 GEORGIA TECH 23</h3>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h1></h1>
<table width="550" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row" width="150"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/KraftFightHunger.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/Blogpics/kraft.jpg" alt="" width="136" height="114" /></a></th>
<th scope="row" width="422">FIGHT HUNGER BOWL<br />
Saturday, December 31st @ 3:30 p.m.<br />
Click on the bowl logo for MORE info!!!!</th>
<th scope="row" width="153"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/KraftFightHunger.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/Blogpics/kraft.jpg" alt="" width="136" height="114" /></a></th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table width="550" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<col span="6" width="85" />
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="17">
<h2 align="center">UCLA (6-7) VS ILLINOIS (6-6)</h2>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="157" height="17"></td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Rushing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Passing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Points</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">TO’s</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">ST</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">A.O.R</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="17">UCLA</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="104">188</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">140</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">22</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">2.0</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">•••</div>
</td>
<td width="104">106.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="17">ILLINOIS</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">167</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">140</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">19</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">2.8</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">-</div>
</td>
<td width="104">100.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="17">“The Wilted Rose Bowl” as IL began the season 6-0 for the 1st time S/’51 but now has the dubious distinction of being the 1st FBS program to head into a bowl with a 6 gm losing skid which saw HC Zook axed. UCLA got a waiver from the NCAA to get here w/a 6-7 rec’d after losing the P12 Title gm to UO and dismissing HC Neuheisel (both tms interim HC’s here). UCLA leads the series 6-5 with a 4 gm win streak incl 2-1 in bowls. The 2 had a common opp in Ariz St who they both beat: IL 17-14 at home despite being outgained by 122 yds while UCLA upset ASU 29-28 while being outgained by 49 yds. IL is 4-9 in bowls with Zook getting his only postssn win LY 38-14 over Bay in the Texas Bowl. UCLA had just one other bowl trip in the Neuheisel era which was a 30-21 win over Temple in the EagleBank Bowl in ‘09. IL went 3-6 vs bowl opp TY outgaining them by 37 ypg and being outscored by a little over 2 ppg. The Bruins faced 8 bowl caliber tms going 2-6 while being outscored 38-21 and outgained 454-379. IL last played on Nov 26 while UCLA ended on Dec 2nd. Large sked edge to the Bruins as they have ply’d my overall toughest slate compared to IL’s #47. This very well may be the 1st ever bowl with the tms having a comb losing rec’d at 12-13. UCLA is just the 10th bowl tm S/’80 to have a losing rec’d. They now both make long trips to salvage a winning or .500 rec’d. IL has a large defensive edge and when they have the ball, they’re happy to run it and I&#8217;ll go with the Illini here.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="22">
<h3 align="justify">PHIL’S FORECAST: ILLINOIS 24 UCLA 21</h3>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table width="550" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row" width="150"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/LibertyBowl.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/bowlimages/liberty_bowl.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a></th>
<th scope="row" width="422">LIBERTY BOWL<br />
Saturday, December 31st @ 3:30 p.m.<br />
Click on the bowl logo for MORE info!!!!</th>
<th scope="row" width="153"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/LibertyBowl.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/bowlimages/liberty_bowl.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a></th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table width="550" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<col span="6" width="85" />
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="17">
<h2 align="center">CINCINNATI (9-3) VS VANDERBILT (6-6)</h2>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="157" height="17"></td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Rushing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Passing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Points</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">TO’s</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">ST</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">A.O.R</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="17">CINCINNATI</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="104">118</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">165</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">20</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">2.4</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">•</div>
</td>
<td width="104">98.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="17">VANDERBILT</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">157</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">285</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">29</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">2.4</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">-</div>
</td>
<td width="104">100.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="17">These 2 have met 7x’s with Vandy owning a 4-3 lead (last meeting in ‘94). This is the Cats 1st ever trip to the Liberty Bowl as the SEC generally meets the CUSA Champ. HC Jones is in his 1st bowl with UC however he did coach his former squad C Mich in 2 postseason gms (0-2, did not coach in ‘09 GMAC Bowl). This will mark VU Franklin’s 1st bowl (inaugural ssn as HC). UC and VU both ply’d Conn and Tenn TY with both beating the Huskies and each losing to the Vols (Vandy lost in OT). UC went 3-2 vs bowl tms TY being outgained by 10 ypg in those meetings while VU went just 1-5 being outscored (25-20) and outgained (393-323). UC went 4-2 away from home while VU posted a 1-4 mark. Sked edge does favor Vandy here as they played my #30 toughest vs Cincy’s #103. UC has 10 Sr st’rs among 16 upperclassmen while Vandy has 7 Sr st’rs and 15 upperclassmen. Cincy has the offensive edge while Vandy has the defensive edge even with Collaros being able to participate. Cincy has tasted success in the recent past, but this is only Vandy’s 2nd bowl appearance since 1982. Huge sked edge as VU survived the SEC ssn while UC faced one of the weaker skeds among BCS teams.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="22">
<h3 align="justify">PHIL’S FORECAST: VANDERBILT 26 CINCINNATI 23</h3>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table width="550" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row" width="150"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/Chick-Fil_ABowl.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/bowlimages/chickfila_bowl.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a></th>
<th scope="row" width="422">CHICK-fil-A BOWL<br />
Saturday, December 31st @ 7:30 p.m.<br />
Click on the bowl logo for MORE info!!!!</th>
<th scope="row" width="153"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/Chick-Fil_ABowl.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/bowlimages/chickfila_bowl.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a></th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table width="550" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<col span="6" width="85" />
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="17">
<h2 align="center">VIRGINIA (8-4) VS AUBURN (7-5)</h2>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="157" height="17"></td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Rushing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Passing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Points</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">TO’s</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">ST</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">A.O.R</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="17">VIRGINIA</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="104">154</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">215</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">21</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">2.7</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">-</div>
</td>
<td width="104">96.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="17">AUBURN</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">156</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">190</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">25</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">2.6</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">••••</div>
</td>
<td width="104">101.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="17">Very unusual that two unranked tms are in the Chick-fil-A. These 2 have split their previous meetings with Aub winning in ‘97 28-17 and UVa shutting out the Tigers in ‘99, 19-0. Virginia exceeded expectations TY with 5 close wins by a comb 15 pts. The Cavs handed GT its 1st loss and then defeated UM and FSU on the road (4-1). They were 1 win from the ACC Title gm but lost a 38-0 loss to rival VT. This is UVa’s 18th bowl but 1st since their 31-28 loss to TTech in the ‘07 Gator Bowl. This is Aub’s 11th bowl gm in the L/12Y (7-3) and their 3rd time here during that span (1-1). The Tigers also played here in the SEC Champ gm LY (56-17 win over SC). UVa HC London is in his 2nd yr so this is his 1st bowl although he was DC/asst here for the previous 5 (3-2). HC Chizik is 2-0 in bowls naturally winning the Nat’l Title LY. UVa was 3-4 vs 7 bowl caliber tms being outscored 26-17 and outgained 377-361. The Tigers were 1-4 on the road TY getting outscored 36-14 (-136 yd) while they went 4-5 vs bowl tms getting outscored 33-21 and outgained 427-311. UVa has 13 Sr among 19 upperclassmen st’rs while the Tigers only have 5 Sr’s among 12 upperclassmen. This bowl has had 15 consecutive sellouts and London is hoping UVa’s fan base (doesn’t travel well) will respond since they only sold 10,500 for their last bowl ‘07. Auburn is one of the youngest bowl tms with only 5 Sr starters, yet they played one of the toughest schedules. The progression they made throughout the yr and the bowl practices will make them the superior tm here despite the losses of their DC and RB Dyer (OC Malzahn will still cch here).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="22">
<h3 align="justify">PHIL’S FORECAST: AUBURN 27 VIRGINIA 20</h3>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/12/31/new-years-eve-bowl-forecasts-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Military and Holiday Bowl Forecasts!</title>
		<link>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/12/28/military-and-holiday-bowl-forecasts/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/12/28/military-and-holiday-bowl-forecasts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 21:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Steele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bowl Confidence Contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bowl Projections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Bowl Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Football Forecasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Football Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bowls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forecasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holiday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phil steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toledo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.philsteele.com/?p=5103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MILITARY BOWL Wednesday, December 28th @ 4:30 p.m. Click on the bowl logo for MORE info!!!! TOLEDO (8-4) VS AIR FORCE (7-5) Rushing Passing Points TO’s ST A.O.R TOLEDO 247 215 39 2.3 - 91.8 AIR FORCE 268 190 37 2.5 ••• 93.9 First meeting. Toledo is 2-6 vs current MW tms incl a 40-15 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fblike_button" style="margin: 10px 0;"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F12%2F28%2Fmilitary-and-holiday-bowl-forecasts%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:25px"></iframe></div>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F12%2F28%2Fmilitary-and-holiday-bowl-forecasts%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F12%2F28%2Fmilitary-and-holiday-bowl-forecasts%2F&amp;source=philsteele042&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<table width="550" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row" width="150"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/MilitaryBowl.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/bowlimages/Military_Bowl_Logo.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="94" /></a></th>
<th scope="row" width="422">MILITARY BOWL<br />
Wednesday, December 28th @ 4:30 p.m.<br />
Click on the bowl logo for MORE info!!!!</th>
<th scope="row" width="153"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/MilitaryBowl.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/bowlimages/Military_Bowl_Logo.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="94" /></a></th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table width="550" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<col span="6" width="85" />
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="17">
<h2 align="center">TOLEDO (8-4) VS AIR FORCE (7-5)</h2>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="157" height="17"></td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Rushing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Passing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Points</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">TO’s</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">ST</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">A.O.R</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="17">TOLEDO</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="104">247</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">215</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">39</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">2.3</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">-</div>
</td>
<td width="104">91.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="17">AIR FORCE</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">268</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">190</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">37</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">2.5</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">•••</div>
</td>
<td width="104">93.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="17">First meeting. Toledo is 2-6 vs current MW tms incl a 40-15 loss to Boise at home TY. AF hasn’t played a MAC tm since the late ‘70’s. This is the Rockets 12th all-time bowl (7-4) and while it is their 6th since ‘01 it is just their 2nd since ‘06. LY the Rockets blew a 24-7 lead and lost 34-32 to FIU in what was HC Beckman’s 1st and only bowl as a HC. AF had lofty expectations to start the ssn, but after a rough Oct, needed a win over CSU in the finale to land a bowl. With that win, they’ve won 7 or more in 5 str yrs, a schl rec’d. Falcons are 2-2 in bowls under Calhoun but 2-0 the L/2Y and he is the only cch in AF hist to lead his tm to bowls in his 1st 5Y with the prog. Toledo went 2-3 vs bowl tms but 2 losses were by a comb 8 pts. Falcons went 0-5 vs bowl tms being outscored 39-24 and outgained 431-424. UT tied for the MAC West but missed the Champ gm due to a head-to-head loss to NI, but should be excited here, while AF in the Military Bowl is a no brainer. I like the stability of the coaching staff at AF in this and I&#8217;ll take the Falcons in a tight high scoring affair.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="22">
<h3 align="justify">PHIL’S FORECAST: AIR FORCE 38 TOLEDO 35</h3>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h1> <span id="more-5103"></span></h1>
<table width="550" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row" width="150"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/HolidayBowl.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/Blogpics/holiday.jpg" alt="" width="115" height="101" /></a></th>
<th scope="row" width="422">HOLIDAY BOWL<br />
Wednesday, December 28th @ 8:00 p.m.<br />
Click on the bowl logo for MORE info!!!!</th>
<th scope="row" width="153"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/HolidayBowl.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/Blogpics/holiday.jpg" alt="" width="115" height="101" /></a></th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table width="550" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<col span="6" width="85" />
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="17">
<h2 align="center">CALIFORNIA (7-5) VS TEXAS (7-5)</h2>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="157" height="17"></td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Rushing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Passing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">Points</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">TO’s</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">ST</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">A.O.R</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: left;" height="17">CALIFORNIA</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="104">115</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">185</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">21</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">2.1</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">-</div>
</td>
<td width="104">104.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="17">TEXAS</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">175</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">140</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">22</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">2.7</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div align="center">-</div>
</td>
<td width="104">97.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="17">These tms face each other for the 1st time S/’70 with UT having a 4-0 series lead. After missing out on the postssn LY both ret to bowls at a familiar site as Cal is making its 4th visit to Qualcomm (ply’d Utah ‘09 Poinsettia) while UT plays here for the 5th time (2-2; last in ‘07). Tedford is 5-2 as HC in bowls and Brown is 12-7. These 2 have one common foe in UCLA as Cal was upset 31-14 being outgained by 53 yds with a -3 TO margin while the Horns beat the Bruins 49-20 in the Rose Bowl outgaining them by 171 yds. Cal has ply’d 7 bowl caliber tms going 2-5 being outscored by 7 ppg but outgaining those foes by 23 ypg while UT has played 9 bowl elig tms going 4-5 being outscored by 4 ppg despite outgaining them by 10 ypg. The experience edge goes to Cal who has 18 upperclassmen starters with UT playing the most frosh in Brown’s tenure. The Longhorns missed the postssn last year for the 1st time in 12 seasons so falling to the Holiday bowl is not the negative you may think. This is very reminiscent of the ‘07 season when Brown was disappointed with a 9-3 year and demanded a top-notch performance, and the Horns delivered with an easy win over #12 Ariz St. Texas’ offensive slump down the stretch can be attributed to their top 2 RB’s being out and they are healthy here.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" height="22">
<h3 align="justify">PHIL’S FORECAST: TEXAS 27 CALIFORNIA 20</h3>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/12/28/military-and-holiday-bowl-forecasts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AP Poll: Overrated/Underrated Teams!</title>
		<link>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/08/22/ap-poll-overratedunderrated-teams/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/08/22/ap-poll-overratedunderrated-teams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Steele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Offseason Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clemson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notre Dame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma St]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overrated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phil steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Miss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Underrated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.philsteele.com/?p=4497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The AP Poll was released over the weekend and today I can officially come up with Overrated and Underrated teams for the upcoming year. First, here is the Preseason AP Top 25. 1 Oklahoma (36) 2 Alabama (17) 3 Oregon (4) 4 LSU (1) 5 Boise St (2) 6 Florida St 7 Stanford 8 Texas [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fblike_button" style="margin: 10px 0;"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F08%2F22%2Fap-poll-overratedunderrated-teams%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:25px"></iframe></div>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F08%2F22%2Fap-poll-overratedunderrated-teams%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F08%2F22%2Fap-poll-overratedunderrated-teams%2F&amp;source=philsteele042&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>The AP Poll was released over the weekend and today I can officially come up with Overrated and Underrated teams for the upcoming year.</p>
<p>First, here is the Preseason AP Top 25.</p>
<table width="157" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="left">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" width="31" height="13">
<div align="center">1</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc" width="126">Oklahoma (36)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">2</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Alabama (17)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">3</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Oregon (4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">4</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">LSU (1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">5</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Boise St (2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">6</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Florida St</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">7</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Stanford</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">8</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Texas A&amp;M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">9</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Oklahoma St</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">10</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Nebraska</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">11</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Wisconsin</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">12</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">South Carolina</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">13</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Virginia Tech</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">14</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">TCU</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">15</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Arkansas</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">16</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Notre Dame</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">17</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Michigan St</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">18</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Ohio St</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">19</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Georgia</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">20</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Mississippi St</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">21</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Missouri</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">22</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Florida</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">23</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Auburn</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">24</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">West Virginia</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc" height="13">
<div align="center">25</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">USC</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>Overrated Teams</h2>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/auburntigers_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />#23 Auburn</strong>-There are several signs pointing downward for last year’s defending champ. This year they lose the best offensive player in the NCAA in Heisman winner QB Cam Newton as well as arguably the best defensive player in DT Nick Fairley. Auburn also benefited from an amazing 7 net close wins and naturally the schedule gets tougher with road games vs Clemson, South Carolina, Arkansas, LSU and Georgia. They lose an incredible 31 lettermen and return just 6 starters (fewest in the country). Last year I had Texas as my #1 overrated team (preseason AP #5) and they went from the National Title game to 5-7 and Auburn will have to have some talented youngsters grow up quickly to avoid a similar fate</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/floridagators_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />#22 Florida</strong>-After an 8-5 season (NR) former head coach Meyer stepped down due to health concerns and they bring a new HC in Muschamp who has no previous HC experience and just 10 returning starters. The Gators have just 3 SEC HG’s and play South Carolina and UGA away from home and pull the top two teams (Bama and LSU) out of the West. I think UF may have a tough time topping last year’s 8 wins and will not finish in the AP Top 25 at the end of the year.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/oklahomast_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />#9 Oklahoma St-</strong>Last year I took a lot of flack for picking the Cowboys last in the Big 12 South but nearly every magazine picked them 5th or 6th as they were one of the more inexperienced teams in the country. Naturally they went on to a great season with their first 11-win season in school history. This year they return 2 of their 3 “triplets” in Weeden and Blackmon but OSU loses OC Holgorsen and RB Hunter from an off avg 44.2 ppg, which was their best since 1988. OSU was also +12 in TO’s, has five Big 12 away games (incl at Texas A&amp;M, Texas, Missouri, and Texas Tech) and only had 2 starts lost to injury last year. They do get Oklahoma at home again this year but were outgained by 209 yds to the Sooners last year. There is no question that the Cowboys are very talented but because of having such a tough B12 schedule I do not have them in my Top 15.<span id="more-4497"></span></p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/stanford_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />#7 Stanford-</strong>Last year was a dream season for the Cardinal as they had the 2nd highest AP Poll finish (#4) in school history. This year they do return QB Andrew Luck who is clearly the #1 player for next year’s draft but do lose their top 2 WR’s, 3 starting OL and 4 starters from their defensive front 7. They have just 11 returning starters and go from the battled tested coaching legacy of Harbaugh to a 1st-yr HC. While two of my 9 sets of power ratings call for an unbeaten year, with the loss of their HC and finishing up with USC, Oregon St, Oregon, California and Notre Dame all in a row, they will not match LY’s 12 win total and will finish outside the Top 10.</p>
<h2>Underrated Teams</h2>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/virginiatech_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />#13 Virginia Tech</strong>-The Hokies are not dominant but remind me of LY’s Auburn team in terms of schedule. VT should be favored in all 6 road games and get its toughest opponents at home (like eventual National Champ Auburn who had 4 of its 5 toughest at home). At 6-6 245 with a powerful arm and great mobility which sound a little like Cam Newton, QB Logan Thomas could be a breakout player this year. Finally despite ranking only #15 in my Power Poll, 8 of my 9 sets of power ratings calls for a 12-0 regular season!</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/notredame_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />#16 Notre Dame</strong>-Yes I know the Fighting Irish are probably the most underachieving team in the last 20 years but many signs are pointing upwards this year. HC Kelly who has a history of exceeding my expectations (6 of L/7 years) has a veteran squad with 17 returning starters that are now in the 2nd year of his schemes. While they do not have any cupcakes on the schedule they also have no teams in my Preseason Top 15. They could be favored in their first 11 games and remember Bob Stoops, Jim Tressel, Urban Meyer and Gene Chizik all won national titles in their 2nd years. All 9 sets of my power ratings call for double digit wins with 3 of them calling for a 12-0 season!</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/georgiabulldogs_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />#19 Georgia-</strong>This is a must-win season for HC Mark Richt as he is definitely on the hot seat. The Bulldogs did have 4 net close losses last year and have signed some key newcomers in RB Isaiah Crowell and NT Jonathan Jenkins who should have a huge impact. The Bulldogs avoid the top 3 teams in the SEC West plus get South Carolina at home. UGA is one of my Most Improved Teams and is my upset pick to win the SEC East.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/usc_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />#25 USC-</strong>The Trojans were hit hard by the NCAA LY with a loss of scholarships and no bowls for 2 years. I expected them to be thin but Kiffin found some loopholes and was able to sign 31 players this year and will field a very talented team that can win the Pac-12 South (just not play in the title game). QB Barkley pilots a potent offense and Kiffin Sr will have a much improved D.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/texas_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />Texas</strong>-Mack Brown had led UNC and UT to winning records for 20 str years, the longest active streak of any FBS coach but last year they stunningly plummeted to 5-7. I think Mack Brown has made some great hires at coordinator and keep in mind that UT was -12 in TO’s LY. In ’07 QB Colt McCoy threw 18 int’s but he was much better as a Jr and they will get much better QB play this year after 17 int’s by a soph QB LY. The Horns  finally have a featured RB in true frosh Brown and UT will have a much better year than most expect.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/southmiss_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />Southern Miss</strong>-The Golden Eagles have had 17 consecutive winning seasons, which is the 4th longest active streak among FBS schools. LY they were +94.1 ypg in CUSA play (#1) and were just 8 pts away from a perfect 8-0 CUSA record and a 11-1 regular season mark. This year none of my 9 sets of power ratings call them #1 in the CUSA but almost all have them #2 and they have a schedule that sets up perfect with winnable road games and all the toughest games are at “The Rock”. Four of my 9 sets of power ratings call for a 12-0 record.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/houston_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />Houston</strong>-LY UH was the preseason favorite to win CUSA led by QB Case Keenum. UH put up 122 pts in the first 2 but then Keenum was inj’d and OFY in their loss to UCLA. Keenum was granted a 6th year and college football will benefit from that. His return has me very excited for this year’s squad and 8 of my 9 sets of power ratings call for a double digit win season which will at least double LY’s 5 win total! Three of the 9 call for them to be 11-0 when they travel to Tulsa!</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/usf_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />USF</strong>-Skip Holtz was very successful at East Carolina including B2B CUSA Titles. This year the Bulls are a very talented team and only lose 15 lettermen (fewest in Big East). Two of my 9 sets of power ratings call for 11 wins, and I will call for them to top last year’s 8 win total.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/ohio_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />Ohio</strong>-This year the Bobcats return just 11 starters but have a schedule that is tailor made for MAC success. Their 4 MAC away games are vs teams that finished 1-7, 1-7, 1-7 and 2-6 and they are only one of the top 4 MAC East teams that kept their HC. They avoid the Big 3 out of the MAC West (UT, NIU and WM) and I give them an excellent shot at their first double digit win season since 1968.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/clemson_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />Clemson</strong>-Last year the Tigers had their first losing season since 1998 and this year Dabo Swinney is on the hot seat. They do return 14 starters and bring in a great recruiting class with adding the best set of true frosh LB’s in the country. They did have 4 net close losses last year and do get a key division game vs Florida St (Noles off Oklahoma) at home. Clemson makes my Most Improved list and will easily top LY’s win total.</p>
<h1>Only 10 Days Until The First College Football Game!!!</h1>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/08/22/ap-poll-overratedunderrated-teams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FBS Away Records Past Decade</title>
		<link>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/08/10/fbs-away-records-past-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/08/10/fbs-away-records-past-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Steele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Offseason Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Away Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boise St]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Past Decade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phil steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.philsteele.com/?p=4446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In yesterday&#8217;s blog I took a look at home records from the past decade and today I will look at how team&#8217;s have performed on the road the past decade. Here are the away records for all 120 teams the past 10 years. Away Records 2001-2010 Rank Team Win Loss Total % 1 Texas 38 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fblike_button" style="margin: 10px 0;"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F08%2F10%2Ffbs-away-records-past-decade%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:25px"></iframe></div>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F08%2F10%2Ffbs-away-records-past-decade%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F08%2F10%2Ffbs-away-records-past-decade%2F&amp;source=philsteele042&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>In yesterday&#8217;s blog I took a look at home records from the past  decade and today I will look at how team&#8217;s have performed on the road  the past decade. Here are the away records for all 120 teams the past 10  years.<span id="more-4446"></span></p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Away Records 2001-2010</h2>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<col width="37"></col>
<col width="112"></col>
<col span="3" width="75"></col>
<col width="75"></col>
<tbody>
<tr height="13">
<td width="37" height="13" bgcolor="#ff0000">
<div>Rank</div>
</td>
<td width="112" bgcolor="#ff0000">Team</td>
<td width="75" bgcolor="#ff0000">Win</td>
<td width="75" bgcolor="#ff0000">Loss</td>
<td width="75" bgcolor="#ff0000">Total</td>
<td width="75" bgcolor="#ff0000">%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>1</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Texas</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">38</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">5</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">43</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">88.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>2</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Boise St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">46</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">11</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">57</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">80.70%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>3</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Georgia</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">34</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">10</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">44</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">77.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>4</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">USC</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">45</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">14</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">59</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">76.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>5</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Ohio St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">34</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">11</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">45</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">75.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>6</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Virginia Tech</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">35</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">13</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">48</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">72.92%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>7</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Oklahoma</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">30</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">13</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">43</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">69.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>8</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">TCU</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">40</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">18</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">58</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">68.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>9</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Florida</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">28</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">13</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">41</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">68.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>10</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">LSU</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">30</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">15</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">45</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">66.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>10</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Miami</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">36</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">18</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">54</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">66.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>12</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Oregon</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">35</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">18</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">53</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">66.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>13</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">West Virginia</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">32</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">20</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">52</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">61.54%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>14</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Utah</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">35</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">22</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">57</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">61.40%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>15</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Auburn</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">26</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">18</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">44</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">59.09%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>16</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Tennessee</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">27</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">19</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">46</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">58.70%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>17</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Boston College</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">30</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">22</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">52</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">57.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>18</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">BYU</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">33</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">58</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">56.90%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>19</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Alabama</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">19</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">44</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">56.82%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>20</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Wisconsin</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">28</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">22</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">50</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">56.00%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>21</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Florida St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">29</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">23</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">52</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">55.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>22</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Georgia Tech</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">30</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">24</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">54</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">55.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>23</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Michigan</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">26</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">21</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">47</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">55.32%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>24</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Fresno St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">35</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">29</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">64</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">54.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>25</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Louisville</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">30</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">55</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">54.55%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>26</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Bowling Green</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">34</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">30</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">64</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">53.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>27</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Pittsburgh</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">28</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">53</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">52.83%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>28</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Navy</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">24</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">22</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">46</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">52.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>29</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Nebraska</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">24</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">23</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">47</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">51.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>30</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">USF</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">27</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">27</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">54</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">50.00%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>30</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Cincinnati</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">29</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">29</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">58</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">50.00%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>30</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Notre Dame</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">23</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">23</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">46</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">50.00%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>33</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Oklahoma St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">26</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">51</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">49.02%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>33</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Hawaii</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">26</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">51</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">49.02%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>35</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Texas Tech</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">26</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">28</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">54</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">48.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>36</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Iowa</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">24</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">26</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">50</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">48.00%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>37</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Southern Miss</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">29</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">32</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">61</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">47.54%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>38</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Northern Illinois</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">28</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">31</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">59</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">47.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>39</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">California</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">29</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">54</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">46.30%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>40</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Miami, Ohio</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">31</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">36</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">67</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">46.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>41</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Clemson</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">22</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">26</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">48</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">45.83%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>42</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Penn St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">21</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">46</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">45.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>43</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Northwestern</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">30</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">55</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">45.45%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>43</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Air Force</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">30</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">55</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">45.45%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>45</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Missouri</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">20</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">45</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">44.44%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>46</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Arkansas</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">19</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">24</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">43</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">44.19%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>47</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">South Carolina</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">21</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">27</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">48</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">43.75%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>48</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Maryland</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">22</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">29</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">51</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">43.14%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>49</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Michigan St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">21</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">28</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">49</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">42.86%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>49</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Oregon St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">24</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">32</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">56</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">42.86%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>51</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Wake Forest</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">23</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">31</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">54</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">42.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>52</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Toledo</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">34</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">59</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">42.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>53</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Tulsa</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">26</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">36</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">62</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">41.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>54</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Nevada</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">35</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">60</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">41.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>55</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">NC State</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">20</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">29</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">49</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">40.82%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>56</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Ball St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">26</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">38</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">64</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">40.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>56</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">WKU</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">26</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">38</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">64</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">40.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>58</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Texas A&amp;M</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">19</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">28</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">47</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">40.43%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>59</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">UCLA</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">22</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">34</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">56</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">39.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>59</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Houston</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">22</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">34</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">56</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">39.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>61</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Purdue</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">20</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">31</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">51</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">39.22%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>61</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Rutgers</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">20</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">31</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">51</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">39.22%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>63</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Central Michigan</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">39</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">64</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">39.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>63</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Middle Tennessee</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">39</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">64</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">39.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>65</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Washington St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">21</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">33</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">54</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">38.89%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>66</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Florida Atlantic</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">40</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">65</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">38.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>67</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">UCF</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">23</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">37</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">60</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">38.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>68</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Stanford</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">21</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">34</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">55</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">38.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>68</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Connecticut</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">21</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">34</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">55</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">38.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>70</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">New Mexico</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">22</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">36</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">58</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">37.93%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>71</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">East Carolina</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">23</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">38</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">61</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">37.70%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>72</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Minnesota</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">19</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">32</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">51</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">37.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>73</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">North Carolina</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">20</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">34</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">54</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">37.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>74</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Troy</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">44</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">69</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">36.23%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>75</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Arizona St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">18</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">33</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">51</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">35.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>75</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Arizona</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">18</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">33</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">51</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">35.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>77</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Western Michigan</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">21</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">40</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">61</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">34.43%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>78</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Ohio</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">22</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">42</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">64</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">34.38%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>79</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Colorado St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">19</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">37</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">56</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">33.93%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>80</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Mississippi</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">16</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">34</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">50</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">32.00%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>81</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Marshall</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">19</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">41</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">60</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">31.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>82</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Virginia</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">17</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">37</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">54</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">31.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>83</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Kentucky</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">15</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">33</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">48</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">31.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>84</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">North Texas</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">20</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">45</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">65</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">30.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>85</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Colorado</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">15</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">35</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">50</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">30.00%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>86</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Illinois</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">14</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">33</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">47</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">29.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>86</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Kansas St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">14</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">33</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">47</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">29.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>88</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Memphis</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">16</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">38</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">54</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">29.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>89</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Rice</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">17</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">44</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">61</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">27.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>90</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Syracuse</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">15</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">39</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">54</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">27.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>91</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Kent St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">17</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">45</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">62</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">27.42%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>92</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Louisiana Tech</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">18</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">48</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">66</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">27.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>93</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Louisiana</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">17</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">46</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">63</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">26.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>94</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">UAB</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">17</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">47</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">64</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">26.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>95</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Army</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">13</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">37</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">50</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">26.00%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>96</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Mississippi St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">13</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">39</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">52</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25.00%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>96</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Washington</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">13</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">39</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">52</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">25.00%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>98</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Akron</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">16</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">49</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">65</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">24.62%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>99</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Kansas</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">11</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">35</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">46</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">23.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>100</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">ULM</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">16</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">51</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">67</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">23.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>101</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">UTEP</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">14</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">45</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">59</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">23.73%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>102</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Temple</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">14</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">46</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">60</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">23.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>103</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Vanderbilt</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">12</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">40</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">52</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">23.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>104</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">San Diego St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">14</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">47</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">61</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">22.95%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>105</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Tulane</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">13</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">44</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">57</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">22.81%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>106</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Wyoming</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">13</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">45</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">58</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">22.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>107</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">UNLV</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">13</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">46</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">59</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">22.03%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>108</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Iowa St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">11</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">40</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">51</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">21.57%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>109</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Buffalo</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">13</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">49</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">62</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">20.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>110</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Indiana</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">11</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">42</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">53</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">20.75%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>110</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">FIU</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">11</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">42</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">53</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">20.75%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>112</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">San Jose St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">13</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">54</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">67</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">19.40%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>113</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Baylor</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">10</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">42</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">52</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">19.23%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>114</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Arkansas St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">12</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">52</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">64</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">18.75%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>115</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">SMU</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">11</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">48</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">59</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">18.64%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>116</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">New Mexico St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">11</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">53</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">64</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">17.19%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>117</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Idaho</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">11</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">56</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">67</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">16.42%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>118</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Duke</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">8</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">47</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">55</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">14.55%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>119</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Eastern Michigan</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">9</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">54</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">63</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">14.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" align="right" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>120</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Utah St</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">8</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">58</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">66</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">12.12%</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#ffff00"></td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff00">Totals</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff00">2642</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff00">3959</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff00">6601</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff00">40.02%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The king of the road warriors is Texas which is 39-5 on the road this  decade. I know that Mark Richt has a great record in opposing home  stadiums and this is shown by Georgia&#8217;s 34-10 record on the road this  decade. The usual suspects are at the top with Oklahoma, Boise St, Ohio  St, USC, Virginia Tech, Miami Fl, LSU, TCU, Florida and Oregon all  winning over 64% of the time on the road.</p>
<p>Yesterday I pointed out that the average home winning percentage for  all 120 FBS teams was 63.2% (4625-2690). The 120 teams are a combined  2642-3959 on the road or just 40.02%. Yes, those numbers add up to more  than 100% but that is because wins at home and on the road vs FCS teams  (1AA) only count in the win column and not in the loss column.</p>
<p>Yesterday I pointed out that just 23 teams had a losing record at  home this decade. The numbers are similar on the road with just 29 teams  able to post winning records away from home this decade. Those 29 teams  basically looks like a listing of the whose who in college football but  there are a few surprises. Bowling Green and Louisville are not known  as being powerhouses but make that list.</p>
<p>The teams at the bottom of the list are the usual suspects with Utah  St taking the title for worst road record of the decade. The only teams  that have been regularly in the postseason as of late that are in the  bottom third are Kansas (23.9%) and Kentucky (31.3%).</p>
<p>Yesterday I took at look at home teams and the amount of wins they  had as compared to the amount of times they were expected to lose  (underdog). Today I look at road teams and the amount of wins they had  as opposed to the amount of times they were expected to win on the road.  First let me take a look at which teams have been favored the most on  the road this decade. The winner is USC at 51 times or about 5 times a  year. They have been favored in 51 of their 59 road games. Here is the  top ten. 1. USC (51) 2. Boise St (46) 3. Texas (39) Tied at 4. Miami, Fl  (38) and Utah (38) Tied at 6. Ohio State (37) and TCU (37) Tied at 8.  Virginia Tech (36) and Oklahoma (36) 10. Florida St (35)</p>
<p>Buffalo from 2000-2008 had never been favored or expected to win a  road game but in ‘09 were favored in two games. The others that have  been favored on the road 4 times or less are Duke (1), Eastern Michigan  (2) and Army (4). WKU has not been favored in any road game but has not  had lined games for a full decade.</p>
<p>Here are the teams that have underperformed on the road this decade.  Kansas St has been favored to win 23 games on the road this decade but  has only won 14 of them for -9. There are 6 teams that have won 5 or  fewer times than they have been favored this decade. I will list them in  order and the number in parenthesis is the amount of times they have  been favored minus the amount of actual road wins. Kansas St (9), USC  (6), Oklahoma (6), Florida St (6), Nebraska (6), Michigan (5).</p>
<p>Now lets look at the teams that outperform expectations on the road.  The team that has done the best is Ball St as they have been expected  (favorite) to win just 13 road games but they have actually won 26 games  on the road or +13. Here are the other teams that do better than  expected on the road…Buffalo +11, Navy +11, ULM +10, Army +9 and  Northwestern +9. I find it interesting that Notre Dame has only been  expected to win 14 times on the road this decade yet are 23-23.</p>
<p>In an upcoming blog, I take a look at the biggest disparities between home and away records this decade.</p>
<h2>Only 22 Days Until the First College Football Game!!!</h2>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/08/10/fbs-away-records-past-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Favorite Teams for 2011!</title>
		<link>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/08/04/my-favorite-teams-for-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/08/04/my-favorite-teams-for-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Steele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Offseason Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Favorite Teams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phil steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Miss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.philsteele.com/?p=4385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of people ask me if I have a favorite team. I was born and raised and still live in Cleveland, Ohio. I was a fan of many teams as a child but now that I put out a National magazine, I cannot afford to be a fan of any team. I have to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fblike_button" style="margin: 10px 0;"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F08%2F04%2Fmy-favorite-teams-for-2011%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:25px"></iframe></div>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F08%2F04%2Fmy-favorite-teams-for-2011%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F08%2F04%2Fmy-favorite-teams-for-2011%2F&amp;source=philsteele042&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>A lot of people ask me if I have a favorite team. I was born and  raised and still live in Cleveland, Ohio. I was a fan of many teams as a  child but now that I put out a National magazine, I cannot afford to be  a fan of any team. I have to pick the teams where I think they will  finish each year. I was doing a radio show last week and I was asked if I  have a favorite team or teams. My response was a strong YES! The  interviewer was surprised by that answer and also eager to hear which  team I would pick. My answer was my favorite team each year is the team I  pick #1 in the magazine and my favorite teams are the ones I have  picked higher than all the other major magazines out there. I then said  that each year I establish a list of my favorite teams for that year. I  then give this list to my wife. I wear a shirt and tie to work every day  during the week and my tie is always a college team. I wear polo shirts  during the weekend and when not at work and they are always different  college teams. The list I give my wife is the ones to buy that I will be  wearing for the upcoming year as these are the teams I will be the  biggest fan of for the upcoming season. I was then asked “What teams  will your wife be buying ties and shirts of this year? That was a great  question and I thought I would answer it in a blog.</p>
<p>I went to <a href="http://preseason.stassen.com/consensus/2011.htm">preseason.stassen.com</a> to find out where all the magazines have everyone ranked for the  upcoming year. Here is the list of teams that I will be rooting for the  most this year.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/alabama_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />1. Alabama</strong>-As  I said every year the team that is my pick to win the national title is  my favorite team of the year and this year that team is the Alabama  Crimson Tide. Last year I was ambushed by many Crimson Tide fans because  I did not pick them to go to the national title game when many had them  pre-season #1. They only had 2 starters back on D and a brutal  schedule. In the end Bama went 10-3 and did not play in the title game  like I predicted. This year is a different story. The Tide have the best  defense in the country and their schedule is much more manageable as  they avoid South Carolina and Georgia out of the East and get Arkansas  and LSU at home. I will be decked out in Bama garb all year long and  hopefully they bring home their second national title in three years!<span id="more-4385"></span></p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/southmiss_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />2. Southern Miss</strong>-Take  the most talented team in CUSA and match it up vs the #117 schedule in  the country and you get a Top 20 team! There is a chance there could be a  couple of 12-0 teams in the CUSA title game because four of my 9 sets  of power ratings call for Southern Miss to go 12-0 and this is by far  the best team HC Fedora has fielded in his 4 years. Out of the major  preseason magazines on <a href="http://preseason.stassen.com/consensus/2011.html">stassen.com</a> only Blue Ribbon and myself have the Golden Eagles in the Top 25 and I’m the only magazine to have them in my top 20.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/virginiatech_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />3. Virginia Tech</strong>-  The Hokies draw a lot of comparisons in my mind to last year’s National  Champ Auburn. They have a big mobile 1st year starting QB and have a  schedule in which all of their tough games are at home and they could be  favored in every road game. VT also has one of the top coaches in  college football in Frank Beamer. DC Bud Foster must have been angry the  entire offseason after 2010’s weaker than expected D and should have  them breathing fire. While they rank in 7 of the 8 position categories  in my top units, they are not top 10 talent-wise, but when lined up with  their schedule I give them a great shot at a 12-0 record and another  trip to the ACC Title game. I am the only magazine other than Athlon  that ranks them in the Top 10 and I have them higher than anyone so I’ll  be a big Hokie fan this year.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/houston_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />4. Houston</strong>-Last  year UH was the preseason favorite to win CUSA led by QB Keenum. UH put  up 122 pts in the first 2 but then Keenum was inj&#8217;d and OFY in their  loss to UCLA. The Cougars dropped 2 of the next 3 including a tough loss  to Rice where they had a 436-344 yd edge but lost by 3. After beating  SMU and Memphis, Houston was 5-3 and in the CUSA chase but suffered a  tough loss at home to UCF and QB Piland had 5 int&#8217;s vs Tulsa in the 3 pt  loss. They lost to SM by 18 and TT by 15 to finish 5-7 for their first  losing season since &#8217;04. Keenum&#8217;s return has me very excited for this  year&#8217;s squad and 8 of my 9 sets of power ratings call for a double digit  win season which will at least double LY&#8217;s 5 win total! Three of the 9  call for them to be 11-0 when they travel to Tulsa! UH is not only one  of my Surprise Teams but also one of my favorite teams this year since I  am the only publication that has them ranked in the top 25.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/georgiabulldogs_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />5. Georgia-</strong>South  Carolina is the favorite to win the SEC East for a 2nd year in a row  but both Athlon and myself project the Bulldogs to rebound from a losing  season and capture the East in 2011. Last year was the Bulldogs’ first  losing season since 1996. The Bulldogs did have 4 net close losses and  are hoping that JUCO NT Jenkins (340 lbs) will have the same impact that  NT Terrence Cody had for Alabama and that RB Crowell (PS#4) will have  the same impact that Lattimore had for SC. I like the talent of this  year’s squad and they have just 3 SEC road games which are vs the 3 SEC  teams that finished with a losing records LY! They avoid LSU and Bama  out of the West. This year they have a veteran QB, 14 ret st’rs and a  much better schedule. LY they had close losses to SC and Fla but this  time get SC at home and have a bye before the Gators. UGA also has my #1  rated ST unit. Mark Richt is a coach on the hot seat but has a talented  team with a great schedule and will be the upset winner of the SEC East  therefore making them one of my favorite teams for 2011.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/kansasst_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />6. Kansas St</strong>-I  have the Wildcats tied for 6th in the Big 12 while every other  publication has them projected 8th or 9th. KSU does have to play Texas  Tech, Oklahoma St and Texas on the road but just like the old days coach  Snyder has brought in a lot of JUCO’s as well as a couple of VHT  transfers in RB Bryce Brown (PS#1) and MLB Arthur Brown (PS#5) who  should make an immediate impact. This year’s squad is even more exp’d  than last year’s which made it to a bowl game and with the influx of  talent, the Cats will be back in the postseason.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/ucla_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />7. UCLA</strong>-HC Rick Neuheisel is on the <a href="http://www.philsteele.com/Blogs/2011/Jul11/DBJuly29.html">hot seat</a> and must deliver this year. I think he will and I have the Bruins tied  for 3rd in the Pac-12 South while all of my competitors have them  projected to finish 5th or 6th in the division. The Bruins were just 4-8  LY and this year draw 5 Pac-12 road games and 2 potential Top 25  non-conference foes. They figure to be a dog in all 5 Pac-12 AG’s  including Utah, which will be played in altitude and possible cold  weather in November. I think this year’s Bruins’ squad will be much  better than most folks anticipate (17 returning starters most in Pac-12)  and if they receive better QB play (which I expect), it will make both  their offense and defense stronger. The Bruins actually made my Most  Improved List which means I expect to see them in the postseason and are  one of my favorite teams.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/nevadawolfpack_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />8. Nevada</strong>-The  WAC figures to be very competitive last year and according to the  pre-season publications Hawaii is the favorite but I have the Wolf Pack  as my WAC favorite. There is nowhere near the difference there has been  in the past between the #1 and #8 team. Honestly, if Hawaii, Fresno, La  Tech or Idaho had Nevada’s schedule, I would probably call for them to  win the WAC this year but Nevada has an unbelievably beneficial WAC  schedule. They take on the 3 bottom teams in the conference on the road  and not only benefit from 4 WAC HG’s, but it’s they are against their 4  toughest foes and Nevada has a solid altitude advantage and will  probably have a weather edge vs both warm-climate teams (Hawaii &amp; La  Tech) on B2B Saturdays in Nov. This is a team that would be a  good-sized underdog to last year’s squad but with the schedule, they are  my prohibitive favorite to win the WAC.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/coloradostate_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />9. Colorado St</strong>-I  have the Rams picked for 4th in the MWC while my competition has them  5th or lower. The Rams are off a pair of 3-9 seasons and last year were  -86.1 ypg in MWC play. This year I feel they are one of the most  improved teams in the country and they make my Most Improved List. This  is HC Fairchild’s best team in his four years (including the ‘08 bowl  team) as they have 14 returning starters and for the first time in his  tenure return a starting QB. CSU gets a pivotal game vs SDSt at home  which has me calling them for #4 in the MWC. They also get AF at home  and could actually finish even higher in the MWC.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/pittsburgh_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />10. Pittsburgh</strong>-With  the exception of the USA Today (USF) every other major publication has  West Virginia picked for the Big East title while I have USF and  Pittsburgh tied at the top. HC Todd Graham steps into a great situation.  Pitt has my #1 rated defense in the league and Graham will get the most  out of an offense that has talent. Pitt was +94.9 ypg in conf play (2nd  best) and has one of the top 3 offenses in the Big East. Pitt has 4 BE  HG’s including a Thursday nighter in Sept when they host USF. I am  forecasting a tie for the BE Title but Pitt will hold the tie-breaker  and that would put them into a BCS bowl making them one of my favorite  teams in 2011.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/clemson_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />11. Clemson</strong>-Like  Neuheisel, Dabo Swinney is on the hot seat but only Lindy’s and I have  the Tigers picked 2nd in the ACC Atlantic. Clemson is off a rare 6-7  losing season (first since 1998) and draws both VT and UNC out of the  Coastal. They lose their top 2 defensive players including Da&#8217;Quan  Bowers who had 15.5 sacks but brought in a great recruiting class and  were actually better than their final record in &#8217;10. They had 4 net  close losses and could easily have won games LY vs Auburn, Miami, UNC  and FSU. Clemson makes my Most Improved List and is one of my favorite  teams.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/texas_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />12.</strong> <strong>Texas</strong>-A  lot of people are down on Texas this year after last year’s 5-7 finish  and I am the only magazine to have them ranked higher than 4th (tied for  3rd). Oklahoma took a step back in 2009 but rebounded to win the Big 12  in 2010. Texas took a major step back last year falling to a 5-7 record  and naturally make my Most Improved List. While they have just 12  returning starters (tied fewest Big 12) they were -12 in TO’s last year  and despite finishing last in the Big 12 South, were +53 ypg in the Big  12, which was 5th best. Keep in mind Colt McCoy had 18 int’s as a soph  and rebounded for a big Jr year and whoever wins the Texas QB job should  greatly cut down on the 17 int’s from LY. My talent ratings say Texas  has the best def in the Big 12 and if they get adequate QB play, could  end the season as a surprise Title contender.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/kentstate_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />13. Kent St-</strong> Kent St is a team that was better than its final record in most of HC  Martin’s 7 yrs. They did not catch a lot of breaks. In the last 2 yrs  they had a pair of 4-4 finishes in MAC play losing numerous close games.  Hazell was pleased with the talent he inherited and Kent St also has a  very manageable schedule and my #3 rated O-line and #1 rated D-line in  the MAC. LY’s Miami team gives everyone hope as they went from 1-7 to  7-1 in MAC action. New HC Hazell will bring in the Ohio St wining  attitude and they have a shot at getting to their first bowl S/’72.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/westernmichigan_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />14. Western Michigan-</strong> My main 2 sets of power ratings both call WM the top team in the MAC.  While every other publications has the Broncos picked 2nd or worse, I  have tied for 1st. Unfortunately the Broncos have to face both UT and  NIU on the road. Last year they had a 24-11 FD edge vs Toledo and also  had just 7 pts on four 2H drives inside the NIU15 giving the Huskies  their closest conference game of the season. WM is one of the most  improved teams in the country and while they have to face both Toledo  and NIU on the road, they are actually capable of winning both games and  it wouldn’t surprise me to see Cubit’s Broncos playing in the MAC  Championship game.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/pennst_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />15. Penn St</strong>-I  am the only publication that has Penn St tied atop the Big 10 Leaders  division with most having them 3rd behind Ohio St and Wisconsin. LY Penn  St may have had one of HC Paterno’s youngest ever teams and this year  they are a much more veteran unit with 14 ret st’rs and might be the  most improved team in the Big Ten. There are still question marks at QB  but if they get that situation worked out favorably, I look for PSU to  open the Big Ten portion of their schedule at 6-0 but unfortunately  their final 2 games are at Ohio St and at Wisconsin. A win at one of  those 2 games would likely put Penn St into the first ever Big Ten Title  game.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/RutgersLogo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />16. Rutgers-</strong>Most  publications have the Scarlet Knight picked for 7th or 8th in the Big  East but I have them tied for 6th. Thanks to a late season collapse last  year, Rutgers finished last at -131.6 ypg in BE play and in ‘09 was  -82.7 ypg which was the 2nd worst. While RU has 4 BE HG’s, unfortunately  they are vs the top 4 teams in the league meaning their 3 winnable  games vs the lower half of the conf are all on the road. I like this  Rutgers team and their talent and my main set of power ratings calls  them the 5th best team in the league. The schedule has me calling them  6th but this is a team clearly capable of surprising and has added a lot  of talent this year.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/sanjosestate_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />17. San Jose St-</strong>Only  the Sporting News and myself have the Spartans projected for 6th in the  conference while the rest have them at 7th or 8th. I like what HC Mike  MacIntyre is doing with the Spartans and they are in much better shape  this year. LY they opened up vs Alabama, Wisconsin and Utah, 3 big,  powerful teams that wore them down and helped cause them to have 78  starts lost to injury. They were still, however, very competitive in the  2H of the season and had losses in WAC play by 2, 4, 7 and 3 points and  could have easily have won all 4 (4 net close losses, pg 299). My  computer calls them the most improved team in the WAC and they have 18  returning starters (most in the WAC) and 4 WAC HG’s. While most of my  power ratings call for a losing season, my main set calls for them to go  4-3 in WAC play despite having a 1-15 record in the WAC the last 2  years.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/louisianawarhawks_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />18. ULM-</strong>Only  the Rogers poll and myself have the Warhawks projected for 3rd. Last  year ULM had just 9 returning starters and was in the first year of a  coaching change where the coach has to learn the players and the players  have to learn the new system. They did catch some breaks and nearly got  to bowl eligibility finishing 4-4 in the SBC (+16.8 ypg) and 5-7  overall. This year they have 17 starters back and are in the 2nd year of  the new coach and get a favorable schedule with most of the key games  at home. Their 13 lettermen lost are 2nd fewest in the SBC and they are a  dark horse contender for the SBC Title.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/cincinnati_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />19. Cincinnati-</strong>I  have the Bearcats tied for 3rd in the Big East while the other  publications have them either 4th or 5th. For a good portion of April I  thought I was going to pick the Bearcats #1 in the Big East. They have a  lot of factors pointing to improvement as they are in the 2nd yr under  HC Butch Jones and teams show great improvement in year 2. They were -15  in TO’s last year. They went from a record of 23-4 in ‘08 and ‘09 to  just 4-8 LY and despite their 2-5 Big East record LY were actually +36.4  ypg in conf play and that includes the final game of the season which  they mailed in and were outgained by 165 yards (+70 ypg prior). They  have 15 returning st’rs which is 2nd most in the BE and make my Most  Improved List and my favorite teams list.</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/usc_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />20. USC</strong>-  Only Athlon and myself picked the Trojans first and even though I peg  USC for 1st, the Trojans cannot play for the Pac-12 Title as they are in  the 2nd year of their probation which also keeps them from a bowl. They  can still win the Pac-12 South which should give them more motivation  than they had LY. While this year’s team is young and they draw both  Oregon and Stanford from the North as well as having to face Pac-12  South favorite ASU on the road, the Trojans have plenty of talent and  despite just 62.9% returning lettermen, should finish at the top of the  South.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/OLEMISS.gif" alt="" width="201" height="87" />21. Ole Miss</strong>-I  am the only publication that picked the Rebels to finish of ahead of  defending national champ Auburn. The Rebels were coming off finishes at  #14 and #20 but LY did not go as expected for them as they finished last  in the West at 1-7 and were -74.9 ypg. The Rebels’ 4 SEC HG’s this year  are vs arguably the top 4 teams in the SEC meaning most of their  winnable games are on the road. They have just 65.3% of their lettermen  returning (#9 SEC) incl just 4 st’rs on D but Houston Nutt’s teams do  very well when I put them on my Most Improved List and they find  themselves in that spot this year and will pull some upsets.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>Only 28 Days Until the First College Football Game!</h2>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/08/04/my-favorite-teams-for-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most Improved Teams for 2011!</title>
		<link>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/07/16/most-improved-teams-for-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/07/16/most-improved-teams-for-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 15:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Steele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Offseason Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cincinnati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[most improved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phil steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.philsteele.com/?p=4315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Making my Most Improved List has generally been a blessing for teams, as they usually make big turnarounds. In 1999, the #1 most improved team in my Preseason Rankings was Hawaii and they had the NCAA&#8217;s largest turnaround on record, going from a winless season in 1998 (0-12) to 9-4 and a bowl victory one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fblike_button" style="margin: 10px 0;"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F07%2F16%2Fmost-improved-teams-for-2011%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:25px"></iframe></div>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F07%2F16%2Fmost-improved-teams-for-2011%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F07%2F16%2Fmost-improved-teams-for-2011%2F&amp;source=philsteele042&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Making my Most Improved List has generally been a blessing for teams, as they usually make big turnarounds. <strong>In 1999, the #1 most improved team in my Preseason Rankings was Hawaii and they had the NCAA&#8217;s largest turnaround on record,</strong> going from a winless season in 1998 (0-12) to 9-4 and a bowl victory one year later!!!</p>
<p>The year 2000 was a VERY successful season as well for my Most Improved Teams. <strong>Of the top 14 Most Improved Teams that year, TEN went from a losing season to being bowl eligible!!!</strong> In 2001 and 2002, nine of the 20 teams on my Most Improved List list  each year went from having a non-winning season to making a bowl and<strong> </strong>in 2003,<strong> </strong>8 of the top 20 teams went from a .500 or losing seasons to being bowl eligible.</p>
<p>There was a total of TEN teams that did not have winning records in 2003 who improved to a winning record in &#8217;04. <strong>NINE (90%) of them were on my list!</strong> In 2005, my top 16 Most Improved Teams made incredible strides. <strong>The top 16 Most Improved Teams on my list in 2005 had a combined record of 66-111 (37%) in 2004 and improved to 102</strong><strong>-</strong><strong>84 (55%) in 2005. </strong><span id="more-4315"></span><br />
<strong> </strong></p>
<p>2006 was another great year for the list.<strong> My #1 Most Improved Team in 2006 was Arkansas which went from 4-7 to SEC West Champs and rose as high as #5 in the polls!! </strong>Wake  Forest went from 4-7 to 11-3 and ACC Champs. Houston went from 6-6 to  CUSA Champs! Ohio went from 4-7 to MAC East Champs! Troy went from 4-7  to Sun Belt Champs! The top 10 teams on 2006&#8242;s MIT list were a combined  71-57 (55.5%) in 2006 after being 33-79 (29.5%) in 2005.</p>
<p>2007 was another terrific year! The 22 teams on my list had a  combined record of 92-177 (34.2%) in 2006 but were 145-134 (52%) in  2007. <strong>MY #2 SURPRISE TEAM IN 2007 WAS ILLINOIS AND THEY WENT FROM 2-10 TO THE ROSE BOWL!!! </strong></p>
<p>There were 58 teams in 2007 that did not have a winning record. Of  those 58, 24 managed to improve their record AND be bowl eligible in  2008 or just 41%. Of those 24, SIXTEEN were on my 2008 Most Improved  List (67%)!!!!</p>
<p>2009 was another successful season with 22 teams making my list and of the 22, 12 went from a losing record to bowl eligibility.<strong> Last year my #1 Most improved team Tulsa went from 5-7 to 10-3 and #24  in the country! The 19 teams that made the list had a combined record of  82-149 35.5% in &#8217;09 and improved to a combined 132-109 54.8%!! None of  the 19 went to a bowl in &#8217;09 but 13 of them were bowl eligible LY!</strong><br />
<strong> </strong></p>
<p>With this type of success through the years, you might think that it  is very easy to pick teams that had losing records the previous year and  have become bowl eligible the next season. I went back to 1992 and took  a look at all of the teams that finished with losing records in a  season. In that span, there have been 969 teams that finished with a  record below .500. Of those 969 teams, only 279 of them managed to  finish ABOVE .500 the next year which comes out to just 28.8%. Teams now  play a 12 game regular season so a 6-6 record equals bowl eligibility.  To be fair, out of the 969 teams an additional 51 earned a .500 mark the  next year. So, of the 969 teams, 330 or 34% managed to go from a losing  record to at least .500 the next year.</p>
<p>The combined record of all of the teams which had a losing record  from 1992-2009 was 3044-5762 or 34.5%. The next year those same teams  showed a slight overall improvement in their records to 3836-5236 or  just 42.2%. So on the average, a team that had a losing season in that  span improved by 7.7% over the previous year&#8217;s record. Naturally, the  teams I feel are the most improved are in my top 10. <strong>My top ten  Most Improved Teams over the last 9 years had a combined record of  368-686 (34.9%) the previous year but improved to 583-523 (52.7%) the  next year. That is 17.8% better than the previous year, which is more  than DOUBLE the normal improvement for teams with losing records. Last  year the top ten Most Improved teams went from 46-76 37.7% to 74-53  58.2% for a 20.5% improvement!</strong></p>
<p>In the last 9 years, I have had a total of 190 teams on my Most Improved List. <strong>Of  the 190 teams that made my Most Improved List in the last 9 years, 162  (85.2%) have won at least the same amount of games as the previous year  or have improved their win total (18 of 19, 95% in &#8217;10!).</strong></p>
<p>In the last 9 years, I have listed 176 teams on my Most Improved  Teams list that did not have a winning season the previous year.<strong> Of those 176 teams, almost all improved their record the next year, but  even more impressively, 109 of the 176 teams were bowl eligible the  next year which is 61.9% (44 of 63 70% in &#8217;08-&#8217;10)!</strong></p>
<p>Taking a closer look at the last 9 years, I found that 475 teams had  losing records from 2001-2009, and of those 475 teams, just 129 or 27.1%  managed to have a winning record the next year. <strong>Of those 129  teams, 79 of them were on my Most Improved List or 61.2%!!! Over 61% of  the teams that have gone from a losing season to a winning season have  been on my list! </strong></p>
<p>Looking for some major turnaround teams this year that will surprise? Here are Top 3 Most Improved Teams for 2011.</p>
<h2>Most Improved Teams for 2011</h2>
<p><strong><img src="https://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/houston_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />1. Houston</strong>-Last  year UH was the preseason favorite to win CUSA led by QB Case Keenum.  UH put up 122 pts in the first 2 but then Keenum was inj&#8217;d and OFY in  their loss to UCLA. This year Keenum was granted a 6th year and college  football will benefit from that. UH also had 3 net close losses but does  have just 12 ret st&#8217;rs. Keenum&#8217;s return has me very excited for this  year&#8217;s squad and 8 of my 9 sets of power ratings call for a double digit  win season which will at least double last year&#8217;s 5 win total! Three of  the 9 call for them to be 11-0 when they travel to Tulsa! UH is also  one of my Surprise Teams which means they could be a surprise contender  for the national title and any time a team goes from a 5-7 record to a  probable DD win season will most certainly be at the top of my surprise  list!</p>
<p><strong><img src="https://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/georgiabulldogs_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />2. Georgia-</strong>Last  year was the Bulldogs’ first losing season since 1996. The Bulldogs did  have 4 net close losses and are hoping that JUCO NT Jenkins (340 lbs)  will have the same impact that NT Terrence Cody had for Alabama and that  RB Crowell (PS#4) will have the same impact that Lattimore had for  South Carolina. I like the talent of this year’s squad and they have  just 3 SEC road games, which are vs the 3 SEC teams that finished with  losing records last year! They avoid LSU and Bama out of the West. This  year they have a veteran QB, 14 ret st’rs and a much better schedule.  Last year they had close losses to SC and Fla but this time get SC at  home and have a bye before the Gators. UGA also has my #1 rated ST unit.  Mark Richt is a coach on the hot seat but has a talented team with a  great schedule and will be the upset winner of the SEC East. Going from  6-7 to appearing in the SEC Champ game no doubt has the Bulldogs among  the Top Most Improved Teams for 2011!</p>
<p><strong><img src="https://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/texas_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />3. Texas-</strong> Oklahoma took a step back in 2009 but rebounded to win the Big 12 in  2010. Texas took a major step back last year falling to a 5-7 record and  naturally make my Most Improved List. While they have just 12 returning  starters (tied fewest Big 12) they were -12 in TO’s last year and  despite finishing last in the Big 12 South, were +53 ypg in the B12  which was 5th best. Keep in mind Colt McCoy had 18 int’s as a soph and  rebounded for a big Jr year and whoever wins the Texas QB job should  greatly cut down on the 17 int’s from last year. My talent ratings say  Texas has the best def in the Big 12 and if they get adequate QB play,  could end the season as a surprise national Title contender!</p>
<p><strong><img src="https://www.philsteele.com/images/teamlogos/cincinnati_logo.gif" alt="" width="150" height="100" />4. Cincinnati</strong>-After going 33-7 the previous 3 years, LY’s 4-8 record was the worst since 1999.<strong> </strong>There  are plenty of signs pointing upwards this year. It is HC Butch Jones&#8217;  2nd year, making everyone more acclimated to his systems and they were  2nd worst in the NCAA with -15 in TO&#8217;s last year (TO’s = Turnaround).  They were actually +36.4 ypg in the Big East (3rd best) despite their  2-5 record. The D returns 10 st&#8217;rs which is the most in 5 yrs and the  offense has QB Zach Collaros and RB Isaiah Pead back. They do have 4 Big  East road games (3 at home) and there are just 12 players left from  Kelly&#8217;s &#8217;09 spring class (7 on 2 deep). However, Cincy makes my Most  Improved List and they are a legitimate contender for the Big East  Title!</p>
<h2>Want More? Get the other 12 Teams that made my Most Improved Listby purchasing my 2011 College Football Preview at the <a href="https://www.philsteele.com/store/">PhilSteele.com store</a>!</h2>
<h3>Only 48 Days Until the First College Football Game!!</h3>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/07/16/most-improved-teams-for-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2011 Top 25 Frosh Recruiting Rankings</title>
		<link>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/02/28/2011-top-25-frosh-recruiting-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/02/28/2011-top-25-frosh-recruiting-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Steele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recruiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida St]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incoming Frosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phil steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top 25]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.philsteele.com/?p=3951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are my top 25 2011 recruiting rankings. They take into account the strength of the Top 5 signees, the Top 10 signees and the average signing grade per player for the overall class. This list is not about the quantity of the freshmen signed but the overall quality of the class. Sometimes a team [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fblike_button" style="margin: 10px 0;"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F02%2F28%2F2011-top-25-frosh-recruiting-rankings%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:25px"></iframe></div>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F02%2F28%2F2011-top-25-frosh-recruiting-rankings%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2011%2F02%2F28%2F2011-top-25-frosh-recruiting-rankings%2F&amp;source=philsteele042&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Here are my top 25 2011 recruiting rankings. They take into account  the strength of the Top 5 signees, the Top 10 signees and the average  signing grade per player for the overall class. This list is not about  the quantity of the freshmen signed but the overall quality of the  class. Sometimes a team with a small class of just 15 players may rate  higher than one with 30. (Keep in my mind these rankings could be  tweaked by the time my magazine hits the newsstands in early June)<span id="more-3951"></span></p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">2011 Top 25 Frosh Recruiting Ratings</h2>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<col span="2" width="65"></col>
<col width="36"></col>
<tbody>
<tr height="13">
<td width="81" height="13" bgcolor="#ff0000">
<div>RANK</div>
</td>
<td width="195" bgcolor="#ff0000">TEAM</td>
<td width="91" bgcolor="#ff0000">CONF</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>1</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">ALABAMA</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">SEC</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>2</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">TEXAS</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">BIG 12</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>3</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">FLORIDA ST</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">ACC</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>4</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">USC</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">PAC 10</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>5</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">GEORGIA</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">SEC</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>6</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">AUBURN</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">SEC</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>7</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">OHIO ST</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">BIG 10</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>8</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">NOTRE DAME</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">INDEP</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>9</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">LSU</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">SEC</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>10</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">FLORIDA</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">SEC</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>11</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">CLEMSON</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">ACC</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>12</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">OKLAHOMA</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">BIG 12</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>13</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">OREGON</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">PAC 10</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>14</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">CALIFORNIA</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">PAC 10</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>15</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">NEBRASKA</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">BIG 10</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>16</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">S CAROLINA</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">SEC</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>17</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">N CAROLINA</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">ACC</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>18</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">TENNESSEE</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">SEC</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>19</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">STANFORD</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">PAC 10</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>20</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">MISSISSIPPI</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">SEC</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>21</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">ARKANSAS</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">SEC</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>22</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">MICHIGAN</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">BIG 10</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>23</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">VIRGINIA</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">ACC</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>24</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">PENN ST</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">BIG 10</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">
<div>25</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">WASHINGTON</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">PAC 10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Top Classes By Conference</h2>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="489" align="center">
<col span="3" width="79"></col>
<tbody>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#ff0000">TEAM</td>
<td bgcolor="#ff0000">CONF</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td width="285" height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">ALABAMA</td>
<td width="202" bgcolor="#cccccc">SEC</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">OHIO ST</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">BIG 10</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">TEXAS</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">BIG 12</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">FLORIDA ST</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">ACC</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">USC</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">PAC 10</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">RUTGERS</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">BIG EAST</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">TCU</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">MWC</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">UCF</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">CUSA</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">LOUISIANA TECH</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">WAC</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">TOLEDO</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">MAC</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">WKU</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">SUN BELT</td>
</tr>
<tr height="13">
<td height="13" bgcolor="#cccccc">NOTRE DAME</td>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">INDEP</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Here are some interesting notes on this year&#8217;s signing ratings.  Alabama signed my #1 class for the second time in three years. They  signed two of my PS#1 players in PS#1 OL Cyrus Kouandjio and PS#1DB  Ha’sean Clinton-Dix. Texas despite all the coaching turnover signed  another deep class and could have the biggest frosh impact player in  PS#1RB Malcolm Brown who could fill the void of Texas’ recent RB  struggles. FSU HC Jimbo Fisher has done a great job since taking over  and not only had a successful season on the field but also signed one of  the best classes with four of my top 50 players in the country. Despite  being on probation, USC continued their recruiting dominance as they  signed the top class in the Pac 10 for the <strong>10th straight season and are led by PS#1WR George Farmer!!</strong></p>
<p>Breaking down by conference, naturally the SEC led the way with 9  teams in my top 25 followed by 5 teams from the PAC-10. Also represented  well were the ACC and Big 10 who each had 4 teams.  I will have a  complete final rankings of teams 1-75 in a later blog this spring.</p>
<p>Obviously recruiting rankings are a good tool to predict a team&#8217;s  future success, but are clearly just a part of a team&#8217;s success. A good  example of this is Cincinnati who won back-to back Big East Titles in  2008-09<strong> despite finishing no higher than 6th in conference or #62 nationally since 2005. </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.philsteele.com/2011/02/28/2011-top-25-frosh-recruiting-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Military/Texas/Alamo Bowl Forecasts!</title>
		<link>http://blog.philsteele.com/2010/12/29/militarytexasalamo-bowl-forecasts/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.philsteele.com/2010/12/29/militarytexasalamo-bowl-forecasts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Steele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bowl Projections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bowls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forecasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma St]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phil steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.philsteele.com/?p=3816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MILITARY BOWL 2:30 PM ESPN Click on the bowl logo for MORE info!!!! EAST CAROLINA (6-6) VS MARYLAND (8-4) Rushing Passing Points TO’s ST A.O.R EAST CAROLINA 97 305 29 2.5 - 98.0 MARYLAND 198 240 44 1.5 •••• 99.0 First meeting between these two teams and this will be the final game for Maryland [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fblike_button" style="margin: 10px 0;"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2010%2F12%2F29%2Fmilitarytexasalamo-bowl-forecasts%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:25px"></iframe></div>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2010%2F12%2F29%2Fmilitarytexasalamo-bowl-forecasts%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2010%2F12%2F29%2Fmilitarytexasalamo-bowl-forecasts%2F&amp;source=philsteele042&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<table style="height: 114px;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="550">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th width="150" scope="row"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/MilitaryBowl.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/bowlimages/Military_Bowl_Logo.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="106" height="94" /></a></th>
<th width="422" scope="row">MILITARY  BOWL<br />
2:30 PM ESPN<br />
Click on the  bowl logo for MORE info!!!!</th>
<th width="153" scope="row"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/MilitaryBowl.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/bowlimages/Military_Bowl_Logo.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="106" height="94" /></a></th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table style="height: 382px;" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="550">
<col span="6" width="85"></col>
<tbody>
<tr height="17">
<td colspan="7" height="17">
<h2 style="text-align: center;">EAST CAROLINA (6-6) VS MARYLAND (8-4)</h2>
</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td width="157" height="17"></td>
<td width="104">
<div>Rushing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>Passing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>Points</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>TO’s</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>ST</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>A.O.R</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17">EAST CAROLINA</td>
<td width="104">97</td>
<td width="104">
<div>305</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>29</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>2.5</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>-</div>
</td>
<td width="104">98.0</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17">MARYLAND</td>
<td width="104">
<div>198</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>240</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>44</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>1.5</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>••••</div>
</td>
<td width="104">99.0</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td colspan="7" height="17">First meeting between these two teams and this will be the final game for Maryland HC Ralph Friedgen as he was fired a couple of weeks ago despite winning the ACC COY award. East Carolina dropped the final 2 games of the regular season by a 107-76 mark finishing at 6-6 and narrowly reaching the postseason while Maryland is very disappointed as they went from a 2-10 tm, to 8-4 but were relegated to the 8th seeded ACC bowl. These two both played Navy and NC State with EC going 1-1 as they knocked off NCSt in OT before being blasted at home vs Navy 76-35 (all’d 521 rush yds). MD went 2-0 stopping Navy twice at the GL to preserve a 3 pt win in the opener and they fought off an NC State comeback bid in the finale.</p>
<p>East Carolina’s success TY can be solely credited to their offense (#26) led by JC transfer Davis who broke Jeff Blake’s school TD pass record with 36 as EC avg’d 38 ppg and 445 ypg. The defense is ranked #119 all’g 43 ppg and an FBS worst 479 ypg on the year including dismal performances vs Navy (76 pts, 521 rush) and Rice (62 pts, 639 yds). The secondary all’d 258 ypg (60%) with a 30-9 ratio placing them #102 in my pass D rankings. EC also has my #98 ST unit.</p>
<p>Many MD fans were up in arms when backup QB O’Brien saw the field vs Navy (fmbl’d his 1st college att). Now those same fans are singing his praise. O’Brien was thrust into the spotlight vs FIU and remained the starter even after option runner Robinson ret’d from injury. The top receiver, Smith, is the first 1,000 yd receiver here S/’92. The Terps have scored 6 non-off TD’s TY and 4 have come by the #44 rated D. MD ranks #24 in my pass eff D all’g 221 ypg (53%) with a 15-17 ratio and MD has my #5 ST’s unit with PR Logan finishing #3 NCAA and avg nearly as much as the top KR. MD is also +4 in the punt block department.</p>
<p>EC has been one-dimensional as they have my #119 D and have allowed 40+ pts 9 of 12 games but MD is not an offense that sustains long drives. EC’s offense has been dynamic and they have topped 32 pts in their L/8 gms and this game should feature a lot of points but the Terps might have the emotional edge sending their coach off with a win in his final game after a pretty successful tenure.<span id="more-3816"></span></td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="7" height="22">
<h3>PHIL’S FORECAST: MARYLAND 37 EAST CAROLINA 34</h3>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table style="height: 102px;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="550">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th width="150" scope="row"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/TexasBowl.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/bowlimages/TEXAS.png" border="0" alt="" width="129" height="87" /></a></th>
<th width="422" scope="row">TEXAS BOWL<br />
6:00 PM ESPN<br />
Click on the  bowl logo for MORE info!!!!</th>
<th width="153" scope="row"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/TexasBowl.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/bowlimages/TEXAS.png" border="0" alt="" width="129" height="87" /></a></th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table style="height: 426px;" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="550">
<col span="6" width="85"></col>
<tbody>
<tr height="17">
<td colspan="7" height="17">
<h2 style="text-align: center;">ILLINOIS (6-6) VS BAYLOR (7-5)</h2>
</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td width="157" height="17"></td>
<td width="104">
<div>Rushing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>Passing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>Points</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>TO’s</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>ST</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>A.O.R</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17">ILLINOIS</td>
<td width="104">253</td>
<td width="104">
<div>183</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>32</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>1.6</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>•</div>
</td>
<td width="104">101.7</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17">BAYLOR</td>
<td width="104">
<div>168</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>278</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>31</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>2.7</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>-</div>
</td>
<td width="104">101.0</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td colspan="7" height="17">Baylor is off to its 1st bowl since 1994 facing an Illini team which will play in its first non-BCS bowl since 1999 and just its 3rd bowl in the last 10 years. The teams have played just once before, a 34-19 Illinois home win in ‘76. While both are excited to be in the posteason Waco is about 190 miles away from Houston which should give the Bears a large crowd edge and more than 60,000 tickets have been sold here. Both teams struggled down the stretch as the 7-2 Bears were ranked for the 1st time since 1993 before losing their last 3, all to ranked teams, while Illinois lost 3 of its last 4. The Bears last played on Nov 20th while Illinois finale came 13 days later on Dec 3rd so they should have less rust to knock off.</p>
<p>After B2B losing seasons Illinois went the unusual route of keeping HC Zook but making wholesale staff changes. Six new assistants were hired including OC Petrino from Ark and DC Koenning from Kansas St and Zook now has more of an advisory role. IL had just one 1st Tm All-B10 RB in the L/25Y but Leshoure changed that as he led B10 RB’s in rushing including a school record 330 (FBS best in ‘10) vs Northwestern. The Illini looked to have 1 of the most improved D’s in the country before allowing 39.3 ppg and 430 ypg in the L/4 vs spread offenses. Zook attributed ST improvements to using more starters as IL finished #50 (#110 in ‘09). Both K’s rec’d All-Conf recognition with P Santella #2 B10 avg with a 37.9 net while K Dimke has hit 26-31 in his career.<br />
The Bears big season came courtesy of dynamic QB Griffin who sparked a big play offense (26 plays of 30+ incl 18 TD). Griffin was #7 NCAA total offense just 1 year removed from ACL surgery which ended his ‘09 season after 3 games. “RG3” picked up where he left off earning 2nd Tm B12 honors and becoming the Bears 1st 3,000 yd passer. In the off season Briles called the D his speediest and deepest unit yet but the Special Teams finished just #95 although P Epperson was #19 NCAA in avg with a respectable 37.8 net. K Jones started off on fire hitting 18 of his 20 before missing 2, having 1 blk’d and also missing an xp in a loss to A&amp;M.<br />
While Illinois has the big edges on both defense and special teams, Baylor has the big crowd edge and has the best overall player on the field in QB Griffin. I do expect both teams to play loose as they are both excited to be bowling but in the end the Bears win a shootout.</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td colspan="7" height="22">
<h3 style="text-align: center;">PHIL’S FORECAST: BAYLOR 34 ILLINOIS 31</h3>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table style="height: 117px;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="550">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th width="150" scope="row"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/AlamoBowl.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/bowlimages/alamo_bowl.gif" border="0" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a></th>
<th width="422" scope="row">ALAMO BOWL<br />
9:15 PM ESPN<br />
Click on the  bowl logo for MORE info!!!!</th>
<th width="153" scope="row"><a href="http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/BowlInfo/AlamoBowl.html"><img src="http://www.philsteele.com/images/bowlimages/alamo_bowl.gif" border="0" alt="" width="150" height="100" /></a></th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table style="height: 458px;" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="550">
<col span="6" width="85"></col>
<tbody>
<tr height="17">
<td colspan="7" height="17">
<h2 style="text-align: center;">ARIZONA (7-5) VS OKLAHOMA STATE (10-2)</h2>
</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td width="157" height="17"></td>
<td width="104">
<div>Rushing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>Passing</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>Points</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>TO’s</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>ST</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>A.O.R</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17">ARIZONA</td>
<td width="104">135</td>
<td width="104">
<div>278</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>27</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>2.4</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>-</div>
</td>
<td width="104">103.7</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td height="17">OKLAHOMA ST</td>
<td width="104">
<div>141</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>323</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>32</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>2.3</div>
</td>
<td width="104">
<div>•</div>
</td>
<td width="104">101.7</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: left;" height="17">
<td colspan="7" height="17">Both of these teams were thinking BCS bowls after hot starts but wound up here instead for the school’s 7th ever meeting (1st S/’42). Arizona was 7-1 and ranked #13 but a 4 game slide KO’d them from the Top 25. Oklahoma St’s 10-1 start marked the 1st time in program history they tied for the B12 South Title and won 10 games in a season. OSU was blitzed by OU for 588 yds in a 47-41 loss which landed them here for the 3rd time. This is the 3rd straight bowl game that Stoops has guided his team to but they did catch a break with a lack of bowl bids in the conf (USC inelig) to get what is normally the #2 P10 bowl while Gundy has led his program to a record 5th consecutive bowl. Both beat Washington St with OSU winning the opener 65-17 at home while Arizona got a 24-7 road win.<br />
AZ’s #23 ranked off avg’d 30 ppg and 445 ypg. QB Foles answered his ‘09 campaign with an equally as impressive 2nd year despite missing 2 games mid-year with a dislocated kneecap. Scott took over and picked up 2 important conf wins (Wash, UCLA) as the off avg’d 520 ypg in his 2 gm stint. The Wildcat D all’d 22 ppg and 343 ypg ranking them 23rd. The unit actually held 6 of their first 7 opp under 310 yds (455 ypg all’d over L/4, all bowl eligible tms). The ST unit earned my #58 rating with All-P10 K Zendejas best known for the 2 missed xp’s in the finale vs ASU.</p>
<p>Gundy probably earned his Big 12 COY award by giving up play calling duties after LY’s bowl loss and hiring ex-Houston OC Holgorsen. However Holgorsen was hired as the coach in waiting at West Virginia and you have to think that may be a distraction here. The Pokes did exploe to become my #3 offense thanks to the 1st Tm Big 12 triplets of QB Weeden, RB Hunter and WR Blackmon. Weeden became the 1st QB ever to be named 1st Tm All-Conf in OSU history leading the conf in pass efficiency and #3 nationally in pass ypg. His main weapon was Big 12 OPY Biletnikoff winner WR Blackmon who had 100 yd receiving and at least 1 TD in 11 gms while RB Hunter led the Big 12 in rushing after an inj-plagued ‘09. Despite replacing 9 st’rs, OSU finished with my #48 D as DC Young knew the challenge of fielding a capable stop unit along side a quick strike offense was to build up the depth. OSU usually has 1 of my best ST units thanks to 1 of the NCAA’s best ST coord DeForrest. Groza winner Bailey hit 8-10 from 40+ and P Sharp’s 41.0 net was #3 NCAA and his 53 TB led the nation.</p>
<p>On Nov. 1st, both teams were 7-1 with Arizona ranked #13 and Oklahoma St was ranked #19. Now six weeks later, Arizona is off 4 straight losses while OKSt was hoping for a Big 12 Championship but lost to their Bedlam Rivals. I certainly appreciate the job that HC Gundy has done but with the distraction of Holgorsen leaving has me thinking Arizona will keep this game closer than what many expect. However, the Pokes do get their first 11 win season in school history.</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td colspan="7" height="22">
<h3 style="text-align: center;">PHIL’S FORECAST: OKLAHOMA ST 38 ARIZONA 35</h3>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.philsteele.com/2010/12/29/militarytexasalamo-bowl-forecasts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AP Poll: Overrated/Underrated Teams</title>
		<link>http://blog.philsteele.com/2010/08/24/ap-poll-overratedunderrated-teams-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.philsteele.com/2010/08/24/ap-poll-overratedunderrated-teams-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Steele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Offseason Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notre Dame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overrated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phil steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Underrated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.philsteele.com/?p=3183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The AP Poll was released over the weekend and today I can officially come up with Overrated and Underrated teams for the upcoming year. First, here is the Preseason AP Top 25. Rk Team 1 Alabama (54) 2 Ohio State (3) 3 Boise State (1) 4 Florida 5 Texas (1) 6 TCU 7 Oklahoma (1) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fblike_button" style="margin: 10px 0;"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2010%2F08%2F24%2Fap-poll-overratedunderrated-teams-2%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:25px"></iframe></div>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2010%2F08%2F24%2Fap-poll-overratedunderrated-teams-2%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2010%2F08%2F24%2Fap-poll-overratedunderrated-teams-2%2F&amp;source=philsteele042&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>The AP Poll was released over the weekend and today I can officially come up with Overrated and Underrated teams for the upcoming year.</p>
<p>First, here is the Preseason AP Top 25.<span id="more-3183"></span></p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Rk</th>
<th>Team</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Alabama (54)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Ohio State (3)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Boise State (1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>Florida</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>Texas (1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>TCU</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Oklahoma (1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Nebraska</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Iowa</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Virginia Tech</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>11</td>
<td>Oregon</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>12</td>
<td>Wisconsin</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>13</td>
<td>Miami (FL)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>14</td>
<td>USC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>15</td>
<td>Pittsburgh</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>16</td>
<td>Georgia Tech</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>17</td>
<td>Arkansas</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>18</td>
<td>North Carolina</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>19</td>
<td>Penn State</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>20</td>
<td>Florida State</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>21</td>
<td>LSU</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>22</td>
<td>Auburn</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>23</td>
<td>Georgia</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>24</td>
<td>Oregon State</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>25</td>
<td>West Virginia</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>Overrated Teams</h2>
<p><strong>#5 Texas</strong>-I think the Top 10 is reasonably legitimate and the Longhorns are once again one of the most talented teams in the country and they have my #1 defense. They do face my #5 team Nebraska in Lincoln and my #1 team Oklahoma in Dallas, but will be a solid favorite in all of the rest of their games. They do lose a 4-year starting QB in Colt McCoy, their top WR in Jordan Shipley and have not really had a feature RB since Jamaal Charles (’07), so there are some questions on offense. While I think it will be another solid season for the Longhorns I think a Top 5 finish as projected by the AP is a bit of a reach this year.</p>
<p><strong>#12 Wisconsin</strong>-The Badgers are coming off a 10-win season and are a much more veteran team this year. Many of my sets of power ratings have them slightly ahead of Iowa but they have to play the Hawkeyes on the road and get #2 Ohio St at home. They do avoid Penn St but the Michigan and Michigan St road trips will be much tougher than most suspect. While 5 of my 9 sets of ratings call for a double digit win season, I think another Top 15 ranking will be tough to duplicate.</p>
<p><strong>#15 Pittsburgh</strong>-When I list my rankings in the magazine, they are my end of season rankings and I have Pittsburgh #27. I do have the Panthers winning the Big East title by beating West Virginia at home which would give them the tie-breaker. However, they have just 11 returning starters and have to face Utah and Notre Dame on the road and Miami, Fl at home in non-conference play. By winning the conference, I have them playing in the Fiesta Bowl against Nebraska, but I think the Panthers could have four losses at the end of the year.</p>
<p><strong>#16 Georgia Tech</strong>-Paul Johnson is a great coach and last year I undervalued the Yellow Jackets and paid the price as they not only won the Coastal, but won the ACC Title outright. This year they have to play Clemson, Virginia Tech, North Carolina and Georgia all on the road and Miami at home in which the Yellow Jackets could be a underdog in each game. Despite the tough schedule, they have 14 returning starters and could make me pay again for picking them 4th in the Coastal this year.</p>
<p><strong>#21 LSU</strong>-The talent is there for LSU to contend for the SEC West Title and even knock off Alabama at home. They do have to play SIX teams in my Top 25 (#10 schedule) and only have 10 returning starters. Keep in my mind LY they went 9-4 but were outgained on the year 328-305. This is a talented squad with my #19 rated defense and a lot of VHT’s on offense but with the schedule they could find it tough matching last year’s 9 regular season wins and could finish out of the Top 25 for the second time in 3 years.</p>
<h2>Underrated Teams</h2>
<p><strong>#7 Oklahoma</strong>-The last time the Sooners came off a 5 loss season was 2000 which is the last time they won the National Title!  While they lost 7 players to the draft including four 1st-rounders, two of the top draftees (Bradford and Gresham) did not really play. Last year despite their 5-3 Big 12 record, the Sooners’ +133 ypg was the league’s best. They also had 42 starts lost to injury (tied #3 FBS) and had 3 net close losses. This year they are in much better shape on the offensive line, QB Landry Jones has a year under his belt and all 9 sets of my power ratings call for an unbeaten season. With all these factors added up, the Sooners are my pick to win the National Title in 2010!</p>
<p><strong>#22 Auburn</strong>-Many Auburn fans were not happy when HC Gene Chizik was hired (just 5-19 at Iowa St) but I thought he did a solid job here last year guiding the Tigers to a 8-5 record including a New Year’s Day Bowl win. This year Auburn has 15 returning starters and are in the second year of Chizik’s system. The schedule also sets up nicely for them as they get 4 key SEC games at home and my main set of power ratings calls for an 11-1 season with an 11-0 vs 11-0 showdown vs Alabama in the Iron Bowl. The Tigers will easily top LY’s 8 win total and I have them finishing #15.</p>
<p><strong>Notre Dame</strong>-HC Brian Kelly gets the most out of the talent on hand and he is the first coach in the history of my magazine to have his team finish higher than I projected them in SIX straight years (including 3 conference titles). He inherits a lot of talent here with 14 returning starters including All-American candidates WR Floyd and TE Rudolph. He does have a new QB in Crist but remember Kelly won a BE title with 5 different QBs in 2008. I feel the Irish have clearly underachieved the last 3 seasons and I think they could be in store for 9 wins or more this year.</p>
<p><strong>South Carolina</strong>-This could finally be the year Steve Spurrier envisioned when he came to Columbia. The Gamecocks have 16 returning starters and are one of the top teams in the SEC. They have my #3 rated defense and lose just 11 letterman. This year they do have to play Florida on the road and draw Alabama from the West but it would not surprise me if Spurrier had the team in the SEC Title game this year despite facing the 2nd toughest schedule in the country.</p>
<p><strong>Houston</strong>-They Cougars have one of the best offenses in the country with QB Case Keenum, three 1,000 yd receivers and RB Beall who has nearly 2,000 yds in his 1st two seasons. Houston also should have an improved defense this year with 6 starters back including three of the top 4 returning tacklers. Not only are the Cougars my pick for the CUSA title, but 2 of my 9 sets of power ratings call for an undefeated season with winnable road games at UCLA and Texas Tech.</p>
<p><strong>Arizona</strong>-My magazine is the only one in the country to have the Wildcats in the Top 25 and they are a legitimate Pac-10 title contender. Arizona could have easily won the conference title last year but had a pair of 3 pt losses and came up just short. While they only have 4 starters back on defense, they only lose 17 letterman and will have a potent offense. They get 5 Pac-10 home games and a road trip to Washington St. I will call for them to have their most wins since 1998 and have a shot at their 1st ever Rose bowl which would make a great story.</p>
<p><strong>Only 9 Days Until The First College Football Game!!!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.philsteele.com/2010/08/24/ap-poll-overratedunderrated-teams-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AP Top 10 Projection Results</title>
		<link>http://blog.philsteele.com/2010/08/23/ap-top-10-projection-results/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.philsteele.com/2010/08/23/ap-top-10-projection-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Steele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Offseason Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP Top 10 Projection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boise St]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio St]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phil steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.philsteele.com/?p=3176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the weekend the preseason AP Top 25 was released with defending national champ Alabama clearly ranked #1. Every year I am particularly intrigued by who is placed in the preseason AP Top 10 as I try to predict what those teams will be shortly after the previous season is completed. Most AP voters usually [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fblike_button" style="margin: 10px 0;"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2010%2F08%2F23%2Fap-top-10-projection-results%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:25px"></iframe></div>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2010%2F08%2F23%2Fap-top-10-projection-results%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.philsteele.com%2F2010%2F08%2F23%2Fap-top-10-projection-results%2F&amp;source=philsteele042&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Over the weekend the preseason AP Top 25 was released with defending national champ Alabama clearly ranked #1. Every year I am particularly intrigued by who is placed in the preseason AP Top 10 as I try to predict what those teams will be shortly after the previous season is completed.</p>
<p>Most AP voters usually look at a couple of criteria when they evaluate a team for the upcoming season. First they look at the number of returning starters that the team has coming back particularly at the offensive skill positions. A team that returns its starting QB and a combination of its RB and WRs is often times more highly thought of than a team that loses its starting QB but returns its entire offensive line. Similarly a team that returns most of its starters on offense but loses a lot of its defensive playmakers usually is more highly thought of than a team that returns a majority of its defensive starters but loses its skill position players on offense.<span id="more-3176"></span></p>
<p>Another factor that is heavily weighted is the performance of the team in the bowl game, which undoubtedly is the lasting image of that team in the offseason. A team coming off a huge bowl win usually is more highly thought of than a team that is coming off a bowl loss regardless of what their schedule looks like for the upcoming season.<br />
Using these criteria and a few more, I project the preseason AP Top 10 every year at the conclusion of the previous season, which in most cases is nearly 7 months in advance. Now as you all know, a lot can happen from January to August and for further proof on that check on my players lost list, which is all the changes that have been made for each team since my magazine was published in May.</p>
<p>Last year my projected Top 10 for the AP Poll was #1 Florida, #2 Texas, #3 USC, #4 Oklahoma, #5 Alabama, #6 Virginia Tech, #7 LSU, #8 Oklahoma St, #9 Ohio St and #10 Mississippi. The actual AP Top 10 was #1 Florida, #2 Texas, #3 Oklahoma, #4 USC, #5 Alabama, #6 Ohio St, #7 Virginia Tech, #8 Mississippi and#9 was a tie between Oklahoma St/Penn St.</p>
<p>I <strong>nailed nine of the ten teams</strong> that appeared in the Preseason Top 10 with the only exception being LSU/Penn St and I may have had something to do with that. It’s interesting to note that of the main preseason magazines, only two had Penn St ranked in the Top 10 and I had them my #1 surprise team and ranked #5. Most had Penn St out of the Top 10. Perhaps since I had them rated so high in my magazine, it influenced a few voters across the country, bumping them into the Top 10.</p>
<p>This year way back in my <a href="http://www.philsteele.com/Blogs/2010/Feb10/DBFeb03.html">February 2nd Blog</a>, I projected the preseason AP Top 10 would be #1 Alabama, #2 Ohio St, #3 Boise St, #4 Oregon, #5 Texas, #6 TCU, #7 Iowa, #8 Florida, #9 Nebraska and #10 Virginia Tech.</p>
<p>The actual AP Top 10 which came out over the weekend was #1 Alabama, #2 Ohio St, #3 Boise St, #4 Florida, #5 Texas, #6 TCU, #7 Oklahoma, #8 Nebraska, #9 Iowa and #10 Virginia Tech.</p>
<p><strong>For the second year in a row I nailed nine of the ten teams that appeared in the Preseason Top 10 with the only exception being Oregon/Oklahoma, which I can defend easily</strong>.</p>
<p>First, at the time I wrote my projection back in early February Duck QB Jeremiah Masoli was not yet suspended. With Masoli still in the fold at that point Oregon had 17 returning starters including RB LaMichael James and Masoli in the backfield. The Ducks clearly would have been a preseason Top 10 team and probably Top 5 had Masoli not been kicked off the team. Even without Masoli Oregon was still rated #11 in the preseason poll.</p>
<p>The team that I did not have in my projected AP Top 10 was Oklahoma (#7) and if you have purchased my magazine or listed to one of my radio shows across the country you know I think very highly of the Sooners this year as I have them ranked #1. Like Penn St last year perhaps since I had them rated so high in my magazine, it influenced a few voters across the country, bumping them into the Top 10 despite the Sooners having five losses last year and the fact that they did not even finish in the final AP Top 25.</p>
<p>I also am pleased that six of the 10 teams are ranked in the exact position that I projected way back in February including the top 3 in Alabama, Ohio St and Boise St. I also had Texas, TCU and Virginia Tech ranked in their exact positions in the poll.</p>
<p>So there you have it, next year when you see my preseason AP Top 10 projection in late January or early February go ahead and compare it to the first AP poll that will come out several months later and I know you’ll find that probably 9 or maybe even all 10 will be in the Preseason AP Top 10.</p>
<p><strong>Only 10 Days Until the First College Football Game!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.philsteele.com/2010/08/23/ap-top-10-projection-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

