Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Virginia Tech’

Sugar Bowl Forecast!

January 3rd, 2012 No comments
SUGAR BOWL
Tuesday, January 3rd @ 8:30 p.m.
Click on the bowl logo for MORE info!!!!

MICHIGAN (10-2) VS VIRGINIA TECH (11-2)

Rushing
Passing
Points
TO’s
ST
A.O.R
MICHIGAN 205
175
29
2.3
-
100.9
VIRGINIA TECH
130
205
21
1.9
95.7
First meeting. UM makes its 2nd appearance in the Sugar Bowl with a previous 9-7 loss to Aub in 1983. They return to the BCS lineup for the 1st time since the ‘06 Rose Bowl and overall UM is 1-3 in the big bowls since the BCS was instituted in 1998. Hoke has been the HC in just 2 bowls in his career, going 1-1 losing the ‘07 International Bowl to Rutgers while at Ball St while beating Navy in LY’s Poinsettia Bowl with SDSt. The Wolves players will want to erase any lingering memories of LY’s 52-14 bowl thrashing by Miss St, the worst postssn perf in schl hist which proved to be Rich Rodriguez’s swan song. VT surprisingly received the at-large bid trumping Boise, K-St and Baylor to make their 4th trip to the Sugar Bowl (1-2) to face Mich, despite being dominated by Clemson 38-10 in the ACC Title game, the only team they lost to… twice! VT is the only team in the FBS to have 8 str 10 win ssns and has a chance to go for win #12 for the 1st time in schl history. Beamer is 8-10 in bowls. UM went 2-2 on the road TY outgaining foes by 49 ypg. VT went 6-1 with a 22 ypg edge. UM went 8-2 vs bowl tms outgaining them by 63 ypg. The Hokies faced 8 bowl caliber tms going 7-2 but being outscored 27-20 and outgained 404-342 (Clem 2x). Hokies fans travel well which is the reason they were able to nab the bid but they actually trailed UM in ticket sales here. Michigan is certainly excited to be in their 1st BCS bowl since 2006, but VT has not lost their final 2 gms of the season S/’03.

PHIL’S FORECAST: VIRGINIA TECH 26 MICHIGAN 24

 

AP Poll: Overrated/Underrated Teams!

August 22nd, 2011 4 comments

The AP Poll was released over the weekend and today I can officially come up with Overrated and Underrated teams for the upcoming year.

First, here is the Preseason AP Top 25.

1
Oklahoma (36)
2
Alabama (17)
3
Oregon (4)
4
LSU (1)
5
Boise St (2)
6
Florida St
7
Stanford
8
Texas A&M
9
Oklahoma St
10
Nebraska
11
Wisconsin
12
South Carolina
13
Virginia Tech
14
TCU
15
Arkansas
16
Notre Dame
17
Michigan St
18
Ohio St
19
Georgia
20
Mississippi St
21
Missouri
22
Florida
23
Auburn
24
West Virginia
25
USC

Overrated Teams

#23 Auburn-There are several signs pointing downward for last year’s defending champ. This year they lose the best offensive player in the NCAA in Heisman winner QB Cam Newton as well as arguably the best defensive player in DT Nick Fairley. Auburn also benefited from an amazing 7 net close wins and naturally the schedule gets tougher with road games vs Clemson, South Carolina, Arkansas, LSU and Georgia. They lose an incredible 31 lettermen and return just 6 starters (fewest in the country). Last year I had Texas as my #1 overrated team (preseason AP #5) and they went from the National Title game to 5-7 and Auburn will have to have some talented youngsters grow up quickly to avoid a similar fate

#22 Florida-After an 8-5 season (NR) former head coach Meyer stepped down due to health concerns and they bring a new HC in Muschamp who has no previous HC experience and just 10 returning starters. The Gators have just 3 SEC HG’s and play South Carolina and UGA away from home and pull the top two teams (Bama and LSU) out of the West. I think UF may have a tough time topping last year’s 8 wins and will not finish in the AP Top 25 at the end of the year.

#9 Oklahoma St-Last year I took a lot of flack for picking the Cowboys last in the Big 12 South but nearly every magazine picked them 5th or 6th as they were one of the more inexperienced teams in the country. Naturally they went on to a great season with their first 11-win season in school history. This year they return 2 of their 3 “triplets” in Weeden and Blackmon but OSU loses OC Holgorsen and RB Hunter from an off avg 44.2 ppg, which was their best since 1988. OSU was also +12 in TO’s, has five Big 12 away games (incl at Texas A&M, Texas, Missouri, and Texas Tech) and only had 2 starts lost to injury last year. They do get Oklahoma at home again this year but were outgained by 209 yds to the Sooners last year. There is no question that the Cowboys are very talented but because of having such a tough B12 schedule I do not have them in my Top 15. Read more…

Tonight’s Orange Bowl Forecast

January 3rd, 2011 No comments
ORANGE BOWL
8:30 PM ESPN
Click on the bowl logo for MORE info!!!!

VIRGINIA TECH (11-2) VS STANFORD (11-1)

Rushing
Passing
Points
TO’s
ST
A.O.R
VIRGINIA TECH 194
190
30
2.0
101.1
STANFORD
196
230
31
2.2
-
103.7
First meeting between these two schools. After an 0-2 start to the season, VT capped its incredible turnaround with a win in the ACC Champ game. The Hokies rattled off 11 straight wins and are the only school in the FBS to win 10 gms in each of the L/7Y. They also became the 1st tm S/’00 to win every ACC gm (Fla St). The Cardinal had a superb regular season as they never trailed heading into HT the entire year with one 2H slip up coming against BCS Champ bound Oregon. Both teams faced and destroyed Wake Forest TY with the Deacons being their only common opp. Stanford does have the benefit of an extra week of rest (Hokies played into Dec with ACC Title gm) but does travel more than 3,000 miles to get to Miami while VT is playing in ACC country.
The #20 VT offense is led by prolific QB Taylor who is one of only two active FBS QB’s with 6,000 pass yds and 2,000 rush yds in his career (Nevada’s Kaepernick). He also owns the most wins by a QB in VT history. VT has used a 3-headed monster to man the RB spot with Evans, Wilson and Williams combining for 25 of the team’s 30 rush TD’s (Taylor other 5). on defense, LB Taylor leads VT in tkls and has tallied 15.5 tfl TY. The secondary comes in ranked #6 in my pass eff D all’g 199 ypg (51%) with a 15-22 ratio. CB Hosley has grabbed an NCAA leading 8 int TY. He needs one here to tie Ron Davidson’s 1967 record of 9 in a season. Overall the D ranks #22. Once again VT relied on a Sr walk-on PK to handle the duties and he’s responded by hitting 20 straight (only miss was first att of ssn vs Boise). The return teams have been spectacular as VT avg’s 12.4 ypr on PR with 1 TD while the KR’s avg 23.7 ypr with 2 TD’s (by Wilson). VT (#20 ST ranking) has blocked a kick in 126 gms under Beamer.

With the departure of Heisman runner-up Gerhart, many thought the offense could be down some but they answered critics early and avg’d 40 ppg. The group is led by AA QB Luck who some expect to be the #1 overall pick in the ‘11 draft. This will be his 1st bowl game as he was unable to go in the Sun Bowl LY (inj). Luck took 98% of the team’s passes and was so durable that coaches flirted with using bkup Loukas at other positions during the spg. Overall the SU offense finished with my #4 ranking. The SU defense finished with my #25 ranking all’g just 18 ppg on the ssn (7 opp under 300 yds). The LB’s were the most stable part of the D led by Skov and Thomas who finished #1 and #2 in tkls. The secondary all’d 200 ypg (58%) with a 15-17 ratio ranking #19 in my pass def. Special Team’s were led by the steady kicking of Whitaker who delivered the GW FG vs USC and SU has my #42 ST ranking.
While a lot of analysts will look at both “star” QB’s and predict a ton of points, keep in mind both defenses rank in my top 25. VT will try to run the clock with their diversified rush offense and prior to the ACC Championship, the D had all’d 21 pts or under 7 straight games. SU’s D gets overlooked but has 3 shutouts this year and finished the season all’g 8.8 ppg the L/5. It will also be interesting to see if the rumors surrounding HC Harbaugh’s future employment will effect the play of his team but in the end, I think Luck is the better QB and the Cardinal the better team in a very competitive game. Read more…

AP Top 10 Projection Results

August 23rd, 2010 No comments

Over the weekend the preseason AP Top 25 was released with defending national champ Alabama clearly ranked #1. Every year I am particularly intrigued by who is placed in the preseason AP Top 10 as I try to predict what those teams will be shortly after the previous season is completed.

Most AP voters usually look at a couple of criteria when they evaluate a team for the upcoming season. First they look at the number of returning starters that the team has coming back particularly at the offensive skill positions. A team that returns its starting QB and a combination of its RB and WRs is often times more highly thought of than a team that loses its starting QB but returns its entire offensive line. Similarly a team that returns most of its starters on offense but loses a lot of its defensive playmakers usually is more highly thought of than a team that returns a majority of its defensive starters but loses its skill position players on offense. Read more…

Early Look at the Marquee Non-Conference Games

August 18th, 2010 4 comments

The college football season is fast approaching and in today’s blog I will give you a sneak peak at some of the early marquee college football non-conference games and how I think they will shake out as of right now. Also included is your current voting tallies for each of these games.

Remember if you visit the homepage right now, you can get a head start on voting in the Non-Conference Poll with all the non-conference games. To see where you rank against other voters, as soon as your vote is entered in, you will see the % stacked with or against you. In the next day or two the four remaining non-BCS conferences will be added on the front page. The Non-Conference Poll will run until Sunday, Aug 29th. On Monday the 30th, look for the Weekly Polls to start. There are games every day Thursday September 2nd thru Monday September 6th as the first week of the season looks to kick off with a bang! Weekly prizes will be awarded throughout the season. Read more…

2010′s Homefield Edges

August 9th, 2010 No comments

I have gotten many requests to do a blog to explain how I compute each teams home field edge in the magazine. I have 27 different factors in my computer’s grade of a team. I then compare the computer’s analysis to my own and make the final decision.
While I mention that there are 27 factors in my home field computer ratings, there are actually nine individual factors that I use each year and I then combine the grades for the last three years giving half of the grade to last year, 30% to the numbers from two years ago and 20% to the computer rankings from three years ago.

Today I will go over the nine different areas that I use to rate home field edge. Read more…

ACC Team of the Decade

July 6th, 2010 6 comments

For the next two weeks, I will be taking a look at the conference teams of the decade for 2000-2009. Factored into my analysis will be conference win %, conference and division titles, bowl games and bowl wins. I will also include BCS bowl wins, final AP rankings and number of national championships for the major conferences. There have been several teams who have changed conferences during that time and I will include them in the analysis for any season(s) they were affiliated with that certain conference. I will also be doing a breakdown of how the conference did in bowl games during the decade and I will emphasis the overall win/loss record, the number of BCS bowl wins, and the records against Non-BCS and ranked bowl teams. Read more…

Big East Team of the Decade

July 3rd, 2010 3 comments

First, I want to wish you and your families a very happy and safe 4th of July weekend!

For the next two weeks, I will be taking a look at the conference teams of the decade for 2000-2009. Factored into my analysis will be conference win %, conference and division titles, bowl games and bowl wins. I will also include BCS bowl wins, final AP rankings and number of national championships for the major conferences. There have been several teams who have changed conferences during that time and I will include them in the analysis for any season(s) they were affiliated with that certain conference. I will also be doing a breakdown of how the conference did in bowl games during the decade and I will emphasis the overall win/loss record, the number of BCS bowl wins, and the records against Non-BCS and ranked bowl teams.

While some conferences may have no-brainers as the top team, other conferences were very competitive over the past decade. Here is the schedule for the upcoming week with the conferences I will be analyzing on each date.

Monday Sun Belt 
Tuesday MAC 
Wednesday WAC 
Thursday CUSA 
Yesterday MWC 
Today Big East 
Monday, July 5th Pac-10 
Tuesday, July 6th ACC 
Wednesday, July 7th Big 12 
Thursday, July 8th Big 10 
Friday, July 9th SEC Read more…

2009′s Final Computer Poll vs AP Poll

June 21st, 2010 3 comments

At the end of the 2008 season we devised a formula which plugged in the stats from the just completed season and then factored in the opponents and the site the game was played at and came up with an individual team power rating for each game. I was very pleased that the formula did indeed assign a true power rating for each game and it was highly accurate.

In the weekend blog, I gave you the top 15 individual “game grade” performances from 2009. Today I will give you the teams with the highest game grade averages from last year, which make up my computer’s final Top Ten and compare it to the AP Final Top Ten.

First here is the final AP Top Ten from last year. Read more…

2009′s Top Team Performances

June 18th, 2010 3 comments

 

After the 2008 season was completed I devised a power ratings system, which lets me analyze at what level each team played during an individual game. This “game grade” takes into account the yards rushing, yards passing, points scored, rushing yards allowed, passing yards allowed and points allowed and factors them in against the opponent played and even factors in the site the game was played at.

With all these factors taken into consideration you will see teams that lost the game having a better individual game grade than teams that beat them simply because the team they played was superior and much less was expected of them.

The ratings on each game can vary significantly. For example last year’s highest “game grade” went to the Florida Gators in their dominating performance over Cincinnati in the Sugar Bowl. The Gators received a 123.2 rating for the game. Meanwhile at the bottom of the ratings is Tulane who received only a 25.0 rating for their 49-0 loss to UCF in which the Green Wave were outgained 504-50! Read more…